Saturday, July 5, 2025
spot_img
Dashboard
Home Blog Page 51

Emergency Provision in the Indian constitution: Safeguard and controversies

Dimple Kanojiya
-
0
Emergency Provision in the Indian constitution: Safeguard and controversies

Introduction

The emergency provisions in the Indian Constitution are a powerful set of mechanisms designed to ensure the nation’s stability and security during extraordinary circumstances. These provisions, detailed in Part XVIII (Articles 352-360), empower the central government to act decisively in times of crisis, such as war, external aggression, armed rebellion, financial instability, or a failure of constitutional machinery in a state. While crucial for maintaining order, these provisions have been subject to significant debate due to their potential for misuse. This article explores the detailed framework of these emergency provisions, the safeguards built into the Constitution to prevent abuse, and the controversies that have arisen from their application.

Types of Emergencies

National Emergency (Article 352)

A National Emergency is a significant measure designed to protect India during severe threats. It can be declared by the President of India based on the written recommendation of the Cabinet in situations of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. Initially valid for one month, the proclamation must be approved by both Houses of Parliament to continue. It can be extended indefinitely with Parliamentary approval every six months. During a National Emergency, the central government assumes extensive powers, the federal structure is temporarily altered, and certain fundamental rights (excluding Articles 20 and 21) may be suspended.

  • Conditions: Can be declared on grounds of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.
  • Procedure: Requires the President to proclaim an emergency based on the written recommendation of the Cabinet.
  • Duration and Approval: Initially valid for one month, it must be approved by both Houses of Parliament to continue. It can be extended indefinitely with Parliamentary approval every six months.
  • Effects: The central government assumes sweeping powers, the federal structure is temporarily altered, and certain fundamental rights (excluding Articles 20 and 21) may be suspended.

President’s Rule (Article 356)

President’s Rule addresses situations where there is a failure of constitutional machinery in a state. The President can proclaim this emergency based on a report from the Governor of the state or otherwise. Initially valid for six months, it can be extended up to three years with Parliamentary approval every six months. Under the President’s Rule, the President assumes the functions of the state government, and the state legislature is either dissolved or suspended.

  • Conditions: Invoked when there is a failure of the constitutional machinery in a state.
  • Procedure: Proclaimed by the President upon receipt of a report from the Governor of the state or otherwise.
  • Duration and Approval: Initially valid for six months, it can be extended for up to three years with Parliamentary approval every six months.
  • Effects: The President assumes the functions of the state government, and the state legislature is either dissolved or suspended.

Financial Emergency (Article 360)

A Financial Emergency can be declared by the President if there is a threat to the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof. This proclamation remains in force indefinitely until revoked by the President and requires repeated approval from Parliament every two months. During a Financial Emergency, the central government can direct the reduction of salaries and allowances of all government officials and require all financial and money bills passed by state legislatures to be approved by the President.

  • Conditions: Proclaimed if the President believes that the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is threatened.
  • Procedure: Proclaimed by the President.
  • Duration and Approval: Remain in force indefinitely until revoked by the President, with repeated approval required from Parliament every two months.
  • Effects: The central government can direct the reduction of salaries and allowances of all government officials and requires all financial and money bills passed by state legislatures to be approved by the President.

Effects of Emergency Provisions

Suspension of Fundamental Rights

Fundamental rights, especially those under Articles 19 (freedom of speech and expression) and 21 (protection of life and personal liberty), can be suspended. The infamous 1975-77 Emergency saw widespread curtailment of civil liberties, including censorship of the press and the detention of political opponents without trial. The power of judicial review can be suspended, limiting the judiciary’s ability to intervene and protect individual rights during an emergency

During a National Emergency in India, the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, such as freedom of speech and expression, assembly, and movement, can be suspended. This is authorized under Articles 358 and 359 of the Constitution. Article 358 allows the automatic suspension of Article 19 rights during an Emergency declared on grounds of war or external aggression, while Article 359 enables the President to suspend the right to seek judicial enforcement of other fundamental rights, excluding Articles 20 and 21. These suspensions are intended to empower the government to act decisively in times of crisis but have been controversial, especially given the historical misuse during the 1975-77 Emergency, leading to significant restrictions on civil liberties.

Impact on Democratic Processes

  • Elections and Political Activity: During an emergency, elections can be postponed, and political activities can be restricted. The 1975-77 Emergency saw the suspension of general elections and the curtailment of opposition activities, which undermined democratic processes and institutions.
  • Governance and Administration: The executive branch gains extraordinary powers to implement policies and maintain order, often at the cost of transparency and accountability.

Economic Consequences

Financial Emergency would grant the central government the power to reduce salaries and allowances of all government officials, including those at the state level, and require all financial and money bills passed by state legislatures to be approved by the President. This could centralize financial control and impact economic stability and governance at the state level.

Safeguards

Parliamentary Oversight

  • Approval and Extension: Any emergency proclamation must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within one month. Subsequent extensions require parliamentary approval every six months, ensuring periodic review and accountability.
  • Revocation: The Lok Sabha can revoke a National Emergency by passing a resolution, providing a democratic check on executive power.

Judicial Review

  • Supreme Court and High Courts: These courts have the power to review the validity of an emergency proclamation. In the landmark case of
    Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)
  • Facts: This case challenged the constitutionality of certain amendments made during the Emergency period.
  • Issue: Whether the amendments to the Constitution that curtailed judicial review and expanded the scope of emergency powers were valid.
  • Judgment: The Supreme Court reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine established in Kesavananda Bharati and held that amendments that destroy or damage the basic structure of the Constitution are invalid.
  • Significance: This case reinforced judicial review as part of the basic structure, ensuring that the proclamation of emergency and actions taken under it could be reviewed by the courts the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the proclamation of emergency is subject to judicial review.

Cabinet’s Written Recommendation

The Indian Constitution contains detailed provisions to handle emergencies, recognizing the necessity for the government to act swiftly and decisively in times of national crisis. Among the safeguards to prevent the misuse of these powers, the requirement for the Cabinet’s written recommendation stands as a crucial mechanism, particularly concerning the declaration of a National Emergency under Article 352. This requirement ensures a collective decision-making process, providing a vital check on executive power.

The Role of the Cabinet’s Written Recommendation

Constitutional Requirement:
  • Article 352 stipulates that a National Emergency can only be declared by the President based on a written recommendation from the Cabinet. This provision was reinforced by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978, which aimed to curb the potential for arbitrary use of emergency powers.
  • The term “Cabinet” here specifically refers to the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister, ensuring that such a significant decision is made collectively rather than unilaterally
  •  Requires a written recommendation from the Cabinet, ensuring a collective decision rather than a unilateral presidential proclamation.

Process and Significance:

Collective Decision-Making: The requirement ensures that the decision to proclaim a National Emergency is taken after careful deliberation by the entire Cabinet, reflecting a consensus among the highest executive officials.

Accountability: A written recommendation holds the Cabinet collectively accountable for the decision, making it harder for any single individual to impose an emergency based on personal motives.

Transparency: This process promotes transparency within the executive branch, as the decision must be formally documented and based on concrete evidence and reasoning

44th Amendment Act (1978)

Pranab Mukherjee on the need for constitutional safeguards:

“The 44th Amendment was crucial in ensuring that such an assault on democracy, as witnessed during the Emergency, could never be repeated.”

  • Protects Fundamental Rights: Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended even during a national emergency.
  • Stricter Conditions: Made the proclamation and continuation of a national emergency more stringent.
  • Context: This amendment was enacted in response to the abuses during the 1975-77 Emergency.
  • Provisions: It introduced safeguards against the misuse of emergency provisions, including:
    • Making the proclamation of emergency more stringent.
    • Ensuring that the proclamation must be approved by the Cabinet in writing.
    • Requiring that any extension beyond six months must be approved by Parliament every six months.
    • Protecting the rights under Articles 20 and 21 from suspension during an emergency.
  • Significance: The amendment strengthened the constitutional safeguards to prevent the misuse of emergency powers in the future.

Historical Instances and Controversies

1975-77 National Emergency

“I had to act because there was disorder, chaos, and disruption. The normal functioning of the government and the judiciary was paralyzed”- Indira Gandhi on the 1975 Emergency

Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
  • Facts: Indira Gandhi’s election was declared void by the Allahabad High Court on charges of electoral malpractice. During the emergency, the government amended the Constitution to immunize the Prime Minister’s election from judicial review.
  • Issue: The validity of the amendment and the imposition of emergency itself were in question.
  • Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the election laws’ amendment but stated that such changes should not alter the democratic fabric of the Constitution.
  • Significance: This case illustrated the tensions between constitutional amendments made during an emergency and the principles of democratic governance.
  • Background: Declared by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on grounds of internal disturbance, it lasted for 21 months.
  • Abuse of Power: Widely criticized for suppressing political dissent, curbing press freedom, and detaining political opponents without trial. This period highlighted the potential for abuse of emergency provisions to stifle democracy and civil liberties

Judicial Response:

ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)

Justice H.R. Khanna (dissenting opinion in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, 1976):

“What is at stake is the rule of law. The question is whether the law speaking through the authority of the courts shall be absolutely silenced and rendered mute.”

  • Facts: The case Known as the Habeas Corpus case, arose during the 1975-77 Emergency declared by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
  • Issue: The main issue was whether the right to move the courts for enforcement of fundamental rights could be suspended during an emergency.
  • Judgment: The Supreme Court, by a majority, held that during an emergency, the right to seek judicial remedy for enforcement of fundamental rights (including habeas corpus) stands suspended case, also known as the Habeas Corpus case, saw the Supreme Court controversially upholding the suspension of fundamental rights during the emergency.
  • Significance: This controversial judgment was widely criticized for undermining civil liberties. It was effectively overturned by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978, which ensured that Articles 20 and 21 (protection in respect of conviction for offenses and protection of life and personal liberty) cannot be suspended even during an emergency.

Frequent Use of President’s Rule

  • Misuse: Often criticized for being used by central governments to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties.
  • Judicial Intervention:
  • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
  • Facts: The case arose from the dismissal of several state governments under Article 356, which allows for President’s Rule in states.
  • Issue: The issue was the scope of judicial review over the President’s proclamation of emergency and the use of Article 356.
  • Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the President’s proclamation under Article 356 is subject to judicial review. It also laid down guidelines for the imposition of the President’s Rule to prevent its misuse case established that the imposition of the President’s Rule is subject to judicial review, and the Court can reinstate the dismissed state government if found to be done arbitrarily.
  • Significance: The judgment was a significant check on the arbitrary use of emergency powers and reinforced federalism by protecting state governments from undue dismissal.

Lack of Safeguards for Financial Emergency

  • Concerns: Although a Financial Emergency has never been declared, the extensive control it grants the central government over state finances raises concerns about its potential for abuse and the impact on state autonomy

Conclusion

The emergency provisions in the Indian Constitution are vital for managing extraordinary situations and maintaining national stability. However, their invocation has significant effects, including the centralization of power, suspension of fundamental rights, and impact on democratic processes. The historical misuse of these provisions, particularly during the 1975-77 Emergency, underscores the importance of robust safeguards to prevent abuse. The judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional principles and the amendments aimed at enhancing these safeguards are crucial in balancing the need for emergency powers with the protection of democracy and civil liberties. Ensuring these provisions are used judiciously remains a critical challenge for India’s governance framework. The ongoing challenge lies in ensuring these provisions are used judiciously, maintaining a balance between national security and individual freedoms

“The resilience of a democracy is tested not by the calm of normalcy but by the storms of emergency. India’s past reminds us that the true strength of a nation lies in safeguarding freedoms even when facing the fiercest gales”.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

The role of Fundamental Duties in Indian Democracy

Sommya Kashyap
-
0
The role of Fundamental Duties in Indian Democracy

Introduction

Fundamental Duties: Democracy thrives on a foundation of not just rights, but also responsibilities. While the Indian Constitution famously guarantees its citizens a robust set of Fundamental Rights, it also recognizes the importance of individual contributions to the nation’s well-being. This is where Fundamental Duties come into play.

Introduced in 1976, these duties are a relatively recent addition to the Constitution. Unlike Fundamental Rights, they are not directly enforceable by courts. However, they serve a crucial purpose – reminding citizens of their obligations towards the nation, its institutions, and their fellow citizens.

This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of Fundamental Duties. We will delve into their purpose, the core values they represent, and their significance in strengthening Indian democracy. By examining these duties, we gain a more holistic understanding of what it means to be a responsible citizen in the world’s largest democracy.

Background

The concept of Fundamental Duties in India is a relatively young one compared to the well-established Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Constitution since its inception. Here’s a look at the background of this concept:

  • Pre-Independence Inspiration: The idea of citizen duties wasn’t entirely new. Movements like the Indian independence struggle emphasized concepts like national service and sacrifice. These ideals laid the groundwork for the future inclusion of Fundamental Duties.

  • A Shift in Focus (1970s): Following the Emergency period in the mid-1970s, a need arose to strengthen national unity and social cohesion. The Swaran Singh Committee, formed in 1976, recommended incorporating Fundamental Duties into the Constitution.

  • 42nd Amendment (1976): Building on the Committee’s recommendations, the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 formally introduced Part IV-A to the Constitution, outlining ten Fundamental Duties for Indian citizens.

  • Expansion and Recognition (2002): The 86th Amendment Act of 2002 added another crucial duty – the responsibility of parents or guardians to provide opportunities for education between the ages of six and fourteen years. This further emphasized the importance of individual contributions to national development.

  • Non-Justiciable Nature: It’s important to note that Fundamental Duties are not enforceable by courts like Fundamental Rights. However, they serve as a moral compass, guiding citizens towards responsible behavior and fostering a sense of shared purpose.

Understanding this background provides context for the significance of Fundamental Duties. They represent a conscious effort to foster a sense of responsibility alongside the well-protected rights of Indian citizens.

Concept of Fundamental Duties

Fundamental Duties in the Indian Constitution, enshrined in Article 51A, Part IV-A, represent the moral obligations of every citizen to promote a sense of patriotism and uphold the country’s unity. Introduced by the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976, these duties draw inspiration from the Constitution of the erstwhile USSR and aim to instill a sense of responsibility among citizens.

There are 11 Fundamental Duties, including respecting the Constitution, the National Flag, and the National Anthem, cherishing the ideals of the freedom struggle, upholding sovereignty, protecting the environment, and promoting scientific temper. Although these duties are non-justiciable and cannot be enforced by law, they serve as crucial ethical guidelines, fostering civic consciousness and national integration, thus complementing the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution.

Significance of Fundamental Duties

The Fundamental Duties hold significant importance in the Indian Constitution for several reasons:

  1. Moral Obligations: They emphasize the ethical and moral responsibilities of citizens, fostering a sense of duty towards the nation.
  2. Strengthening Unity and Integrity: By promoting values such as patriotism, environmental conservation, and respect for national symbols, they help in strengthening the unity and integrity of the nation.
  3. Complementary to Fundamental Rights: While Fundamental Rights protect individual freedoms, Fundamental Duties remind citizens that rights come with responsibilities, creating a balanced framework for democratic governance.
  4. Legal Framework Support: They provide a foundation for the enactment of laws that enforce civic duties, such as environmental protection and educational mandates.
  5. Promoting Civic Consciousness: By instilling a sense of responsibility among citizens, Fundamental Duties encourage active participation in nation-building and the democratic process.
  6. Guidance for Judicial Interpretation: Courts often refer to Fundamental Duties while interpreting laws and constitutional provisions, thereby influencing judicial decisions to align with national values and ethics.

Duties under Article 51A

  1. To Abide by the Constitution and Respect its Ideals and Institutions, the National Flag, and the National Anthem:
    • This duty emphasizes the importance of respecting and upholding the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. It also includes respecting national symbols like the flag and anthem, reflecting loyalty and commitment to the nation.
  2. To Cherish and Follow the Noble Ideals that Inspired the National Struggle for Freedom:
    • Citizens are encouraged to remember and follow the ideals of liberty, justice, equality, and fraternity, which motivated the freedom fighters. These principles are essential for maintaining the spirit of the independence movement.
  3. To Uphold and Protect the Sovereignty, Unity, and Integrity of India:
    • This duty calls for citizens to safeguard the country’s sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity against any threat, whether internal or external. It fosters national solidarity and patriotism.
  4. To Defend the Country and Render National Service when Called upon to Do So:
    • Citizens should be prepared to participate in defense activities and offer their services when required, highlighting the importance of readiness to protect the nation.
  5. To Promote Harmony and the Spirit of Common Brotherhood among all the People of India and to Renounce Practices Derogatory to the Dignity of Women:
    • This duty encourages fostering social harmony and brotherhood, transcending religious, linguistic, regional, or sectional diversities. It also emphasizes the renunciation of actions that demean women, promoting gender equality and respect.
  6. To Value and Preserve the Rich Heritage of our Composite Culture:
    • Citizens are expected to appreciate, maintain, and preserve India’s diverse cultural heritage, which includes traditions, monuments, and cultural practices, thereby contributing to cultural continuity and identity.
  7. To Protect and Improve the Natural Environment including Forests, Lakes, Rivers, and Wildlife, and to Have Compassion for Living Creatures:
    • This duty underscores the importance of environmental conservation and sustainable practices. Citizens are encouraged to actively protect and enhance natural resources and exhibit compassion towards all living beings.
  8. To Develop Scientific Temper, Humanism, and the Spirit of Inquiry and Reform:
    • Citizens should cultivate a rational and scientific outlook, prioritize human values, and maintain an inquisitive mindset that seeks continuous improvement and reform in society.
  9. To Safeguard Public Property and to Abjure Violence:
    • This duty highlights the importance of protecting public assets and avoiding destructive behaviors. It promotes a sense of responsibility towards public infrastructure and a peaceful coexistence.
  10. To Strive Towards Excellence in All Spheres of Individual and Collective Activity so that the Nation Constantly Rises to Higher Levels of Endeavor and Achievement:
    • Citizens should aim for excellence in their personal and professional lives, contributing to national development and progress. This duty encourages continuous improvement and the pursuit of high standards.
  11. Who is a Parent or Guardian, to Provide Opportunities for Education to his Child or, as the case may be, Ward between the Age of Six and Fourteen Years:
    • This duty places the responsibility on parents and guardians to ensure that children receive education during their formative years, aligning with the Right to Education and contributing to a knowledgeable and skilled populace.

These Fundamental Duties act as moral and ethical obligations for every citizen, promoting responsible behavior and civic consciousness, thus strengthening the nation’s democratic fabric and fostering a sense of community and shared values.

Interrelation of Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties

The Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties in the Indian Constitution are interrelated and complement each other.

  1. Balancing Rights and Responsibilities: Fundamental Rights provide citizens with essential freedoms and protections, such as the right to equality, freedom of speech, and protection from exploitation. Fundamental Duties, on the other hand, remind citizens of their responsibilities towards the nation and society. Together, they create a balance where rights are enjoyed responsibly.
  2. Promoting National Unity and Integrity: Several Fundamental Rights, like the right to equality (Article 14) and the right to freedom (Article 19), support the unity and integrity of the nation by ensuring equal treatment and freedom for all citizens. Fundamental Duties, such as the duty to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India, reinforce these rights by encouraging citizens to act in ways that strengthen national solidarity.
  3. Mutual Reinforcement: Fundamental Rights and Duties mutually reinforce each other. For instance, the duty to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture (Article 51A(f)) complements the right to cultural and educational rights (Article 29 and 30). Similarly, the duty to develop a scientific temper (Article 51A(h)) supports the right to education (Article 21A).
  4. Ensuring Social Harmony and Justice: Fundamental Rights like the right to freedom of religion (Article 25) and the right against untouchability (Article 17) promote social justice and harmony. Correspondingly, the duty to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood (Article 51A(e)) helps in realizing these rights by encouraging citizens to practice tolerance and respect for diversity.
  5. Fostering Democratic Values: The right to participate in the democratic process (Article 326) is complemented by the duty to uphold the Constitution and respect its ideals (Article 51A(a)). This interrelation fosters a democratic ethos where citizens are not only aware of their rights but also committed to upholding democratic principles.
  6. Environmental Protection: The right to a healthy environment, which is derived from the right to life (Article 21), is supported by the duty to protect and improve the natural environment (Article 51A(g)). This ensures that citizens not only enjoy a healthy environment but also contribute to its preservation.
  7. Judicial Interpretation: The judiciary often interprets Fundamental Rights in light of Fundamental Duties. For instance, in the context of environmental protection, courts have referred to Article 51A(g) to emphasize citizens’ duty to protect the environment while interpreting Article 21.
  8. Educational Implications: The duty of parents to provide education to their children (Article 51A(k)) is aligned with the right to education (Article 21A). This ensures that every child’s right to education is met by the corresponding duties of the parents and the state.

Case laws

  1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986):
    • This case is significant for its interpretation of Article 51A(g), which emphasizes the duty to protect and improve the natural environment. The Supreme Court held that industries should adopt measures to control pollution and that the State should enforce laws for environmental protection. This case underscored the duty of citizens to contribute to environmental conservation.
  2. AIIMS Students’ Union v. AIIMS (2001):
    • In this case, the Supreme Court highlighted the importance of Article 51A(j), which requires citizens to strive for excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity. The Court upheld the validity of merit-based admissions in educational institutions, emphasizing the duty to pursue excellence in education.
  3. Aruna Roy v. Union of India (2002):
    • This case dealt with the inclusion of value education in the school curriculum. The Supreme Court recognized that imparting education about Fundamental Duties under Article 51A should be an integral part of the educational system to instill a sense of duty and responsibility among citizens.
  4. Government of India v. George Philip (2006):
    • The Supreme Court in this case emphasized Article 51A(a), which mandates respect for the Constitution, its ideals, and institutions. The Court held that public servants must uphold constitutional values and work towards the betterment of society, reflecting their duties under Article 51A.
  5. Dr. Dasarathi v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2013):
    • This case involved the duty under Article 51A(h), which encourages citizens to develop a scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform. The Supreme Court stressed the need for scientific education and rational thinking in combating superstitions and irrational practices.
  6. Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1987):
    • This case is significant for environmental jurisprudence. The Supreme Court ordered the closure of limestone quarries in the Dehradun region to protect the environment, reflecting the duties under Article 51A(g).
  7. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997):
    • Although primarily focused on workplace sexual harassment, this case also highlighted the duty under Article 51A(e), which promotes harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood. The Court laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment, thereby fostering a respectful and harmonious workplace environment.

These cases demonstrate how the Indian judiciary has interpreted and enforced Fundamental Duties, emphasizing their significance in promoting responsible citizenship and enhancing the moral and ethical fabric of society.

Conclusion

Fundamental Duties, while not directly enforceable, hold immense significance in shaping a strong and vibrant Indian democracy. They serve as a crucial reminder that citizenship is not just about enjoying rights, but also about fulfilling responsibilities towards the nation and its people.

By upholding these duties, citizens contribute to a more cohesive and progressive society. Respecting national symbols, upholding the Constitution, and promoting social harmony are all essential for a thriving democracy.

The focus on education as a fundamental duty highlights the importance of an informed and engaged citizenry. Fulfilling these duties fosters a sense of shared responsibility and national pride, crucial for India’s continued progress.

While challenges like lack of legal enforcement may exist, the true power of Fundamental Duties lies in their ability to inspire a sense of moral obligation and active participation in nation-building. As citizens increasingly internalize these principles, they become the foundation for a more responsible, just, and prosperous India.

Also read:

Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Basic structure of doctrine

Shreya Sharma
-
0
Basic structure of doctrine

Introduction of Basic Structure of Doctrine

The Basic Structure Doctrine is a judicial principle in Indian constitutional law that holds certain features of the Constitution of India as inviolable. This doctrine emerged from a series of landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of India, which determined that while the Parliament has wide-ranging powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its “basic structure” or essential features. Here is an overview of the development and key components of this doctrine:

The Basic Structure Doctrine is a principle in Indian constitutional law that asserts that there are certain fundamental features of the Constitution of India that cannot be altered or destroyed through amendments by the Parliament. This doctrine ensures that while the Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it does not have unlimited power to change its core principles and essential features. The doctrine was established by the Supreme Court of India to maintain the original ideals and framework of the Constitution.

Key Points to Understand the Basic Structure Doctrine

1. Judicial Safeguard: The doctrine acts as a safeguard against potential misuse of the amendment power by the Parliament, ensuring that the basic identity of the Constitution is preserved.

2. Core Features Protected: While the Supreme Court has not provided an exhaustive list of what constitutes the basic structure, several features have been identified through various judgments, including:
– Supremacy of the Constitution: The Constitution is the highest law, and all laws and amendments must conform to it.
– Republican and Democratic Form of Government: India’s government must remain a democracy with free and fair elections.
– Secularism: The state must treat all religions impartially and equally.
– Separation of Powers: The distinct roles and independence of the executive, legislature, and judiciary must be maintained.
– Federalism: The division of powers between the central and state governments.
– Judicial Review: The judiciary’s power to review and invalidate unconstitutional laws and amendments.
– Rule of Law: All actions of the government must be conducted according to law, ensuring justice and equality.

3. Historical Development: The doctrine was articulated in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Supreme Court held that while the Parliament could amend the Constitution, it could not alter its basic structure. This case was a response to previous conflicting decisions where the extent of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution was debated. The Basic Structure Doctrine limits the amending power of the Parliament, preventing it from enacting changes that would undermine the Constitution’s fundamental framework. This ensures continuity and stability in India’s constitutional democracy.

 Significance

– Protection of Fundamental Rights: Ensures that fundamental rights and liberties are preserved against potential encroachment by the state.
– Preservation of Constitutional Identity: Maintains the original vision and values of the Constitution’s framers.
– Judicial Oversight: Enhances the role of the judiciary in protecting the Constitution from potentially harmful amendments.

In essence, the Basic Structure Doctrine is a critical judicial principle that protects the core values and principles of the Indian Constitution from being altered by legislative changes, ensuring that the foundational framework of India’s democracy remains intact.

Article

The Basic Structure Doctrine is primarily related to Article 368 of the Constitution of India, which deals with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. However, the doctrine itself is not explicitly mentioned in any article of the Constitution. Instead, it is a judicially created doctrine developed by the Supreme Court of India through its interpretations of Article 368 and other constitutional provisions.

Article 368: Power of Parliament to Amend the Constitution

Article 368 of the Indian Constitution outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution. It states:

1. Power of Parliament to Amend the Constitution and Procedure, Therefore:
– Parliament may, in the exercise of its constituent power, amend by way of addition, variation, or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article.

2. Procedure for Amendment:
– An amendment of this Constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill for the purpose in either House of Parliament, and when the Bill is passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting, it shall be presented to the President who shall give his assent to the Bill and thereupon the Constitution shall stand amended in accordance with the terms of the Bill.

3. Special Procedure for Certain Amendments:
– Some provisions, such as those affecting the federal structure, require ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures.

Judicial Interpretation and Development of the Basic Structure Doctrine

The Basic Structure Doctrine was articulated by the Supreme Court in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case (1973). In this case, the Supreme Court held that while Article 368 gives Parliament the power to amend the Constitution, this power is not absolute. Parliament cannot alter the “basic structure” or essential features of the Constitution.

Article 368 of the Indian Constitution: Detailed Explanation

Article 368 of the Indian Constitution grants the Parliament the power to amend the Constitution and lays down the procedures for such amendments. This article ensures that the Constitution is not rigid and can be amended to adapt to changing needs and circumstances, while also incorporating safeguards to prevent hasty or ill-considered changes to its fundamental principles.

Key Provisions of Article 368

1. Power to Amend the Constitution:
– Article 368(1) explicitly states that the Parliament may amend the Constitution by way of addition, variation, or repeal of any provision, following the procedure outlined in the article.

2. Procedure for Amending the Constitution:
– Introduction of Amendment Bill: An amendment can be initiated only by introducing a Bill in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha).
– Passage in Both Houses: The Bill must be passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
– Presidential Assent: Once the Bill is passed by both Houses, it is presented to the President for assent. Upon receiving the President’s assent, the Constitution stands amended according to the terms of the Bill.

3. Special Provisions for Certain Amendments:
– Ratification by States: Certain amendments that affect the federal structure require ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures. This includes amendments that:
– Affect the election of the President.
– Modify the representation of States in Parliament.
– Affect the powers and authority of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
– Alter the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States.
– Amend the provisions of Article 368 itself.

4. Restrictions on Amendments:
– Basic Structure Doctrine: While Article 368 outlines the procedure for amendments, the Supreme Court’s Basic Structure Doctrine imposes an implicit limitation. Parliament cannot amend provisions that constitute the “basic structure” of the Constitution, as identified by the judiciary.

Significance of Article 368

– Flexibility and Adaptability: Article 368 provides the necessary flexibility for the Constitution to evolve over time through amendments.
– Protection of Fundamental Principles: Through judicial interpretations, particularly the Basic Structure Doctrine, Article 368 ensures that the core values and principles of the Constitution are preserved.
– Democratic Process: The requirement of a supermajority in Parliament and, for certain amendments, ratification by State Legislatures, ensures that amendments reflect a broad consensus, protecting the Constitution from hasty or unilateral changes.

Article 368 is a cornerstone of the Indian constitutional framework, balancing the need for change with the preservation of fundamental principles. Its interpretation by the judiciary, especially through the Basic Structure Doctrine, ensures that while the Constitution can adapt to new challenges and needs, its core ethos and foundational values remain inviolable.

Origins and Development

1. Shankari Prasad Case (1951):

– The Supreme Court ruled that the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 includes the power to amend Fundamental Rights.

2. Sajjan Singh Case (1965):

– The court reaffirmed its decision in Shankari Prasad, allowing Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights.

3. Golak Nath Case (1967):

– This case marked a significant shift. The Supreme Court ruled that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights, emphasizing that the power to amend does not include the power to abridge these rights.

4. Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973):

– This landmark case established the Basic Structure Doctrine. The Supreme Court held that while Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure. The basic structure includes essential elements such as the supremacy of the Constitution, the rule of law, the principle of separation of powers, and the objectives outlined in the Preamble (such as justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity).

5. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975):

– The court further elaborated on the Basic Structure Doctrine, stating that democracy, judicial review, and free and fair elections are part of the basic structure.

6. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980):

– The court held that the power of judicial review is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be taken away by an amendment.

7.S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):

– The court expanded on the doctrine, emphasizing the secular nature of the Constitution as part of its basic structure.

 Key Components of the Basic Structure

While the Supreme Court has not provided an exhaustive list of what constitutes the basic structure, several key elements have been identified through various judgments:

1. Supremacy of the Constitution: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
2. Republican and Democratic Form of Government: The democratic framework of the government, including free and fair elections.
3. Secular Character of the Constitution: The state must maintain a neutral stance towards all religions.
4. Separation of Powers: The independence and distinct functions of the executive, legislature, and judiciary.
5. Federalism: The division of powers between the central and state governments.
6. Judicial Review: The power of the judiciary to review and strike down unconstitutional amendments or laws.
7. Rule of Law: The principle that law governs the nation, ensuring equality and justice.

 Impact and Significance

The Basic Structure Doctrine serves as a check on the amending powers of Parliament, ensuring that the core principles of the Constitution remain intact. This doctrine is significant because it protects the fundamental ethos and values embedded in the Constitution, ensuring that amendments do not distort its essential character. It reinforces the stability and continuity of the constitutional order by safeguarding critical principles such as democracy, federalism, and the protection of fundamental rights.

Conclusion

The Basic Structure Doctrine is a cornerstone of Indian constitutional jurisprudence. By limiting the scope of constitutional amendments, preserves the integrity and foundational principles of the Constitution, thus ensuring that the essence of India’s constitutional democracy remains unaltered.

Also read:

Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution: A Promise to the Nation

Dimple Kanojiya
-
0
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution: A Promise to the Nation

Introduction

“The Preamble is the soul of the Constitution.” – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

The Preamble begins with the phrase “We, the people of India,” which is a powerful article in itself, symbolizing the democratic ethos and the collective will of the Indian populace. This article establishes the fact that the authority of the Constitution emanates from the people, making it a people’s document.

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution stands as a profound testament to the principles and aspirations that guide the largest democracy in the world. Often regarded as the soul of the Constitution, it encapsulates the core values and promises made to the nation by its founders. This brief yet powerful introductory statement sets the tone for the Constitution, reflecting the ethos and vision of an independent India. The Indian Constitution is a seminal article that encapsulates the guiding principles and foundational values of the nation. This article serves as a beacon, illuminating the path toward a just, equitable, and democratic society. The Preamble, as an introductory article, lays down the essence of the Constitution, presenting a comprehensive overview of the ideals that the nation strives to achieve.

An Evolving Promise

While the Preamble was crafted with the vision of the Constituent Assembly, its significance has only grown with time. It is a living document, reflecting the changing aspirations and challenges of the nation. Over the decades, various landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of India have reiterated the importance of the Preamble, interpreting it as the guiding light for the Constitution.

Interpretation of Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India has played a pivotal role in interpreting the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.

In the Berubari Union Case, 1960 confirmed that the Indian people are the ultimate bosses. The phrase “We, the people of India” in the Constitution’s Preamble means that the power to make decisions about the country belongs to the citizens. It’s like saying that the people of India have the final say in how the country is run. This decision emphasized that the Constitution gets its authority from the people, and they can change it if needed through their elected representatives in Parliament. So, it’s a way of saying that the people are in charge of their own destiny.

It established that the Indian people, through their elected representatives in Parliament, have the authority to amend the Constitution as they see fit, ensuring that the Constitution remains a dynamic document capable of adapting to the changing needs and aspirations of the nation.

In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), This landmark judgment underscored the Preamble’s importance as an article that embodies the fundamental philosophy and objectives of the Constitution

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and can be used as a tool to interpret its provisions. It established the doctrine of the “basic structure” of the Constitution, which limits the Parliament’s power to amend certain core principles, including those enshrined in the Preamble.

Objective Of Preamble A Promise To the Nation

“The Preamble embodies the basic philosophy and fundamental values of the Constitution.” – Justice Y.V. Chandrachud

The Preamble outlines several objectives, each represented as an article of promise, which reflects the aspirations of the Indian people. The Preamble outlines several objectives, each represented as an article of promise, which reflects the aspirations of the Indian people.

 – Justice:  Social, economic, and political justice is promised to all citizens, ensuring fairness and equality in all spheres of life. This article promises social, economic, and political justice, ensuring that all citizens are treated fairly and without discrimination. “Justice, social, economic, and political,” as enshrined in the Preamble, reflects the commitment to an inclusive society.

– Liberty: The Preamble guarantees liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship, ensuring that individuals are free to pursue their own beliefs and express themselves without fear. The article on liberty guarantees freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship, protecting the individual’s right to personal freedom. Swami Vivekananda’s vision aligns with this: “Liberty is the first condition of growth.”

– Equality: The promise of equality ensures that all citizens have equal opportunity and are not discriminated against on any grounds. This article ensures that all citizens have equal opportunities and are not discriminated against on any grounds, promoting an inclusive society.

B.R. Ambedkar emphasized this principle: “Equality may be a fiction but nonetheless one must accept it as a governing principle.”

– Fraternity: Fraternity is promised to assure the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation. This fosters a sense of brotherhood among all Indians, promoting social cohesion and national integration. The fraternity article assures the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation, fostering a sense of brotherhood and national solidarity. “Fraternity assures the dignity of the individual and the unity of the nation,” as envisioned by the framers of the Constitution

Core Articles of the Promise To Nation

“We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic.” – Preamble of the Indian Constitution

The Preamble is structured around several key articles, each representing a fundamental promise to the nation

  1.  Sovereign: India is a sovereign entity, free from external control. This promise ensures that the country has the absolute authority to govern itself without interference from any external forces. This article declares India’s sovereignty, emphasizing that India is free from external control and has the ultimate authority to govern itself. “The word ‘sovereign’ in the Preamble signifies the authority of the people of India from whom all political power emanates. It asserts that India is free from any external control and can make decisions independently.” – Dr. Rajendra Prasad”
  2. Socialist: The inclusion of socialism in the Preamble signifies the commitment to social and economic equality. This promise aims to reduce the disparities in wealth, income, and status, ensuring that the benefits of development reach every section of society. The inclusion of socialism as an article in the Preamble signifies a commitment to social and economic equality. This article ensures that the state will strive to reduce economic disparities and provide a fair distribution of wealth. “Socialism is a way of life which recognizes liberty, equality, and fraternity as the principles of life,” said Jawaharlal Nehru, capturing the essence of this promise.
  3. Secular: The promise of secularism is a pledge to uphold religious freedom and equality. It means that the state treats all religions with equal respect and does not favor or discriminate against any religion, ensuring that all citizens can practice their faith freely. The secular article guarantees that India will uphold religious freedom and equality. It ensures that the state will remain neutral in matters of religion and will not favor or discriminate against any faith. Mahatma Gandhi’s words resonate here: “I do not expect India of my dreams to develop one religion, i.e., to be wholly Hindu or wholly Christian or wholly Mussalman, but I want it to be wholly tolerant, with its religions working side by side with one another.”
  1. Democratic: This principle ensures that India is governed by elected representatives and that the authority of the government is based on the consent of the governed. The promise of democracy is a commitment to uphold the values of liberty, equality, and fraternity. This article underscores India’s commitment to democracy, ensuring that the government is elected by the people and for the people. It highlights the importance of popular sovereignty and democratic Abraham Lincoln’s famous definition of democracy, “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” captures this promise. 
  2. Republic: As a republic, India has a head of state who is elected, not a hereditary monarch. This promise underscores the principle that all public offices are open to citizens based on merit and democratic choice. The republican article declares that India will have an elected head of state, reinforcing the principle that public offices are open to all citizens based on merit and democratic choice. “The term ‘republic’ in the Preamble signifies the rejection of monarchical rule and the establishment of a system where power resides in the hands of elected representatives, ensuring that every citizen has a voice in governance.” – Dr. S. Radhakrishnan.”

The preamble is a living article

The Preamble is a living article that continually inspires and guides the nation. It is not just an introductory statement but a fundamental article that influences the interpretation of the entire Constitution and the laws of the land. This article remains relevant, constantly reminding the nation of the ideals and promises upon which India was founded.

A Living Document The Preamble is not just an introductory statement but a living document that continuously inspires and guides the nation. It influences the interpretation of the entire Constitution and the laws of the land, reminding the nation of its foundational ideals. As India’s former President, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, said, “The Constitution is not a document that has been handed down from above, but a document that has been created by the people for their own governance.

Educational Impact

The Preamble also plays a vital role in education. It is often one of the first aspects of the Constitution taught to students, introducing them to the values and ideals that underpin the Indian democratic system. Its recitation in schools and public events reinforces its importance and helps instill a sense of national unity and purpose that extends beyond classrooms, fostering a deeper understanding of citizenship, democracy, and constitutionalism, thus empowering individuals to actively engage in shaping the future of their nation. The preamble is profound, serving as a foundational text that introduces individuals to the principles of democracy, equality, and justice. From classrooms to civic education programs, the Preamble acts as a guiding light, illuminating the path toward understanding the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. The preamble extends far beyond rote memorization, shaping informed and engaged citizens who are empowered to contribute positively to the nation’s democratic journey.

Legal Significance of the Preamble in Indian Constitutional Law

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution plays a crucial role in shaping legal arguments, guiding judicial decisions, and upholding the foundational values of the nation’s legal system. It serves as a beacon of constitutional morality, ensuring that laws and government actions are consistent with the democratic ethos and principles of justice enshrined in the Constitution.

  1. Interpretation of Laws: The Preamble provides insight into the intent and purpose behind various constitutional provisions. When interpreting laws or resolving legal disputes, courts often refer to the Preamble to understand the broader objectives and values of the Constitution.

  2. Constitutional Validity:  The Preamble acts as a touchstone for assessing the constitutional validity of laws and government actions. Legal challenges often invoke the Preamble to argue that a particular law or policy violates the fundamental principles enshrined within it.
  3. Protection of Fundamental Rights: The Preamble reaffirms the commitment to justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. Legal practitioners use these principles to advocate for the protection of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, citing the Preamble as a foundational source of these rights.
  4. Public Interest Litigation: In public interest litigation (PIL) cases, where citizens seek judicial intervention to address societal issues, the Preamble often serves as a rallying point. PIL petitions frequently invoke the Preamble to highlight alleged violations of constitutional principles and seek remedial action.
  5. Guiding Legislative Intent: Lawmakers may refer to the Preamble when drafting new legislation to ensure alignment with the foundational principles of the Constitution. By keeping the spirit of the Preamble in mind, legislators aim to create laws that promote justice, equality, and the welfare of the people.
  6. Constitutional Amendments: The Preamble’s principles serve as a safeguard against arbitrary or excessive amendments to the Constitution. Courts have cited the Preamble to uphold the “basic structure” doctrine, which limits the power of the legislature to amend core constitutional principles.

Conclusion

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is much more than an introduction; it is a promise to every citizen of India. It encapsulates the vision of a just, equitable, and inclusive society. By committing to these ideals, the Preamble, as a foundational article, lays the groundwork for governance and societal development, ensuring that the spirit of democracy, freedom, and equality continues to thrive in India. This article stands as a testament to the enduring values and aspirations that guide the nation towards a brighter and more harmonious future the dreams and aspirations of a newly independent nation,  that guide the country’s democratic ethos. As India continues to evolve, the Preamble remains timeless, reminding us of the core values that bind us together as a nation. It is an article of faith, a commitment to upholding the ideals of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity for all.

“The Preamble of the Indian Constitution: A Promise of Justice, Liberty, and Equality”

Also read:

Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Federalism in India: Balancing Power Between the centre and the state

Shreya Sharma
-
0
Federalism in India: Balancing Power Between the centre and the state

Introduction

The Indian constitution establishes the structure of the Indian government, including the relationship between the federal government and state governments. Part XI of the Indian constitution specifies the distribution of legislative, administrative, and executive powers between the union government and the States of India. The legislative powers are categorized under a Union List, a State List, and a Concurrent List, representing the powers conferred upon the Union government, those conferred upon the State governments, and powers shared among them.

This federalism is symmetrical in that the devolved powers of the constituent units are envisioned to be the same. Historically, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was accorded a status different from other states owing to an explicitly temporary provision of the Indian Constitution, namely Article 370 (which was revoked by the Parliament in 2019). Union territories are of a unitary type, directly governed by the Union government. Article 1(1) of the constitution stipulates two-tier governance with an additional local elected government. Delhi and Puducherry were accorded legislatures under Article 239AA and 239A, respectively. establishes the structure of the Indian government, including the relationship between the federal government and state governments. Part XI of the Indian constitution specifies the distribution of legislative, administrative, and executive powers between the union government and the state of India. The legislative powers are categorized under a Union List, a State List, and a Concurrent List, representing, respectively, the powers conferred upon the Union government, those conferred upon the State governments, and powers shared among them.

This federalism is symmetrical in that the devolved powers of the constituent units are envisioned to be the same. Historically, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was accorded a status different from other States owing to an explicitly temporary provision of the Indian Constitution namely Article 370 (which was revoked in parliament in 2019 ). Union territories are unitary type, directly governed by the Union government. Article 1 (1) of the constitution stipulates two tier-governance with an additional local elected government. Delhi and Puducherry were accorded legislatures under Article 239AA and 239A, respectively.

Features

The governmental structure of many countries consists of multiple tiers, such as federal, state, and local levels, each with its own distinct set of powers and responsibilities. These tiers have authority over various aspects such as legislation, taxation, and administration, even though they govern the same group of citizens. The Constitution outlines and guarantees the specific powers and functions of each tier of government, ensuring a clear delineation of authority. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has been granted the authority to arbitrate disputes between state governments, serving as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution in matters of jurisdictional conflicts.

Indian constitution on federalism

The Indian Constitution establishes a federal system of government, which is characterized by the division of powers between the central government and the states. Here are some key aspects of federalism in the Indian Constitution:

1. Division of Powers: The Constitution divides legislative, executive, and financial powers between the Centre and the States through three lists in the Seventh Schedule:
– Union List: Contains subjects on which only the central government can legislate (e.g., defence, foreign affairs, atomic energy).
– State List: Contains subjects on which only state governments can legislate (e.g., police, public health, agriculture).
– Concurrent List: Contains subjects on which both the Centre and the States can legislate (e.g., education, marriage and divorce, bankruptcy).

2. Supremacy of the Constitution: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any law passed by the states must conform to the Constitution. In case of conflict between central and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails.

3. Rigid Constitution: The Constitution of India is a written and rigid constitution. Certain provisions can only be amended with the approval of both the Parliament and at least half of the state legislatures.

4. Bicameral Legislature: The Indian Parliament is bicameral, consisting of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). The Rajya Sabha represents the states of India, ensuring their participation in the legislative process at the national level.

5. Independent Judiciary: The judiciary in India is independent and has the power to resolve disputes between the Centre and the states. The Supreme Court acts as the guardian of the Constitution and ensures the distribution of powers is maintained as per the constitutional mandate.

6. Inter-State Council: Article 263 provides for the establishment of an Inter-State Council to facilitate coordination between states and between the Centre and states.

7. Emergency Provisions: The Constitution provides the Centre with the power to intervene in state affairs during emergencies. There are three types of emergencies:
– National Emergency (Article 352): Can be declared on grounds of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.
– State Emergency (President’s Rule under Article 356): This can be imposed if the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor of a state or otherwise, is satisfied that the governance in a state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
– Financial Emergency (Article 360): Can be declared if the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is threatened.

8. Financial Relations: The Constitution details the financial relationship between the Centre and the states. It provides for the distribution of taxes and grants-in-aid to the states. The Finance Commission is constituted every five years to recommend the distribution of revenues between the Centre and the states.

The Indian federal system is unique because, while it incorporates features of a federal polity, it also contains unitary features that allow the central government to assert its authority under certain conditions, thereby making it a quasi-federal system.

Cases

Several landmark cases in India have shaped and defined the understanding of federalism within the constitutional framework. Here are a few notable cases:

1. State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1963):

– Facts: The central government enacted a law to acquire land and coal-bearing areas in West Bengal. The state challenged this law, arguing that land acquisition falls under the State List and thus outside the Parliament’s purview.
– Decision: The Supreme Court held that the central government had the power to acquire property for a purpose related to a matter enumerated in the Union List. The court emphasized the supremacy of the central government in certain legislative matters.
– Significance: This case reinforced the dominance of the central government in certain areas, highlighting the quasi-federal nature of the Indian Constitution.

2. Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):

– Facts: The case challenged the validity of certain amendments to the Constitution that affected property rights and the jurisdiction of the courts.
– Decision: The Supreme Court established the “basic structure” doctrine, stating that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered by amendments. Federalism was recognized as part of the basic structure.
– Significance: This case ensured that the core principles of federalism cannot be abrogated or destroyed by constitutional amendments.

3. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):

– Facts: The case arose out of the dismissal of several state governments by the central government on the grounds of the breakdown of constitutional machinery (Article 356).
– Decision: The Supreme Court laid down strict guidelines for the imposition of the President’s Rule in states. It ruled that the validity of such proclamations is subject to judicial review.
– Significance: This case significantly curtailed the misuse of Article 356 and strengthened the federal structure by ensuring greater autonomy for state governments.

4. State of Karnataka v. Union of India (1977):

– Facts: Karnataka challenged the central government’s power to appoint commissions of inquiry into matters listed in the State List without state consent.
– Decision: The Supreme Court held that the central government could appoint such commissions under certain circumstances.
– Significance: This case highlighted the complex interplay of powers between the Centre and states, reinforcing the federal balance.

5. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007):

– Facts: The case dealt with the scope of judicial review over laws placed in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution, which was intended to immunize them from judicial scrutiny.
– Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that even laws placed in the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution, including federalism.
– Significance: This case reaffirmed that the principle of federalism is integral to the Constitution’s basic structure and thus protected from being undermined by legislative actions.

These cases collectively illustrate the evolution and reinforcement of federal principles in India, ensuring a balance of power between the Centre and the states while maintaining the supremacy of the Constitution.

Conclusion

The Indian Constitution establishes a unique federal system characterized by a balance of power between the central and state governments. This framework is enshrined in the division of legislative, executive, and financial powers, the role of an independent judiciary, and specific provisions like the Inter-State Council and emergency mechanisms. Landmark cases such as State of West Bengal v. Union of India, Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, State of Karnataka v. Union of India, and I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu have played crucial roles in interpreting and reinforcing the federal structure.

These cases demonstrate the dynamic nature of Indian federalism, ensuring that while the central government retains significant authority, the autonomy and interests of the states are safeguarded. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, has been pivotal in maintaining the balance of power and protecting the core principles of federalism. Through these judicial pronouncements, the federal system in India continues to evolve, adapting to new challenges while preserving the essence of the Constitution.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Directive principles of state policy: a vision for social change

Sommya Kashyap
-
0
Directive principles of state policy: a vision for social change

INTRODUCTION

The Indian Constitution is a multifaceted document, balancing individual rights with the government’s responsibility to create a just and equitable society. While the Fundamental Rights act as a shield against state overreach, the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) serve as a guiding light for the government’s actions.

Unlike the enforceable Fundamental Rights, the DPSPs are non-justiciable, meaning courts cannot directly enforce them. However, they are far from insignificant. Imagine them as a detailed roadmap for the government, outlining the ideals it should strive towards in building a better India. These ideals encompass a wide range, promoting:

  • Social and economic justice: Reducing inequalities in income, status, and opportunities is a core principle, aimed at creating a level playing field for all citizens.
  • Welfare state: The DPSPs envision India as a welfare state, where the government actively works to ensure basic necessities like education, healthcare, and a decent standard of living for all.
  • Dignity and livelihood: The principles emphasize securing the right to work, fair wages, and protection against exploitation, ensuring citizens can live with dignity.

The DPSPs are further categorized into three main strands:

  • Socialist principles: These principles advocate for a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities, drawing inspiration from socialist ideologies. Examples include promoting public ownership of key industries and minimizing wealth concentration.
  • Gandhian principles: Reflecting Mahatma Gandhi’s vision, these principles emphasize self-reliance, rural development, and empowering weaker sections of society. This is reflected in the focus on promoting village panchayats and protecting traditional industries like cottage crafts.
  • Liberal-intellectual principles: These principles draw upon liberal thought, advocating for individual freedom and a modern, scientific approach to development. Examples include promoting a uniform civil code and modernizing agriculture.

The DPSPs have undergone some evolution since their inception. New principles have been added, such as protecting the environment and promoting childhood education. This reflects the changing priorities and needs of the nation.

However, the DPSPs also face some challenges. Their non-justiciability can lead to a lack of accountability, and implementation can be hampered by resource constraints. Additionally, balancing the DPSPs with the Fundamental Rights can be complex.

Despite these challenges, the DPSPs remain a vital part of the Indian Constitution. They provide a moral compass for the government, reminding it of its long-term goals of building a just and equitable society for all. By continuously striving towards these ideals, India can truly fulfill the promises enshrined in its Constitution.

Background of Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)

The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) form an integral part of the Indian Constitution. They are enshrined in Part IV, from Articles 36 to 51. These principles are guidelines for the creation of a social order characterized by social, economic, and political justice. The DPSPs were inspired by the Irish Constitution and reflect the aspirations and vision of the framers of the Indian Constitution.

Historical Context

  1. Irish Influence: The DPSPs were inspired by the Irish Constitution of 1937, which included a section on the Directive Principles of Social Policy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the chairman of the Drafting Committee, and other members of the Constituent Assembly drew from this example to frame the DPSPs.
  2. Indian National Movement: The ideas embodied in the DPSPs were influenced by the objectives of the Indian National Movement. Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi emphasized the importance of social justice, economic welfare, and rural development, which resonated in the DPSPs.
  3. Government of India Act, 1935: Although the Government of India Act, of 1935, did not include DPSPs, it laid the groundwork for the administrative and legislative framework of India. The Act influenced the constitutional design that was later incorporated into the Indian Constitution, including the principles of governance.

Constituent Assembly Debates

The inclusion of DPSPs in the Indian Constitution was extensively debated in the Constituent Assembly. The key points discussed were:

  1. Non-justiciability: It was agreed that these principles would not be enforceable by any court, meaning that no one could approach the judiciary for the enforcement of these principles. This was because making them justiciable would burden the judiciary and complicate governance.
  2. Moral and Ethical Guidance: Members like K.T. Shah argued that DPSPs should provide moral and ethical guidance for the government, ensuring that the State prioritizes the welfare of the people.
  3. Comprehensive Development: The DPSPs were seen as essential for ensuring comprehensive development, including social, economic, and cultural aspects, which could not be achieved through Fundamental Rights alone.

Philosophical Underpinnings

  1. Social Justice: The DPSPs aim to promote social justice by reducing inequalities in income, status, facilities, and opportunities.
  2. Economic Welfare: They emphasize the importance of securing adequate means of livelihood, equal pay for equal work, and the right to work, education, and public assistance.
  3. Gandhian Principles: Many of the DPSPs reflect Gandhian ideals, such as the promotion of cottage industries, living wages, and the organization of village panchayats.
  4. Modern Welfare State: The principles aim to create a modern welfare state where the government is responsible for ensuring the well-being of its citizens, especially the marginalized and disadvantaged sections of society.

Key Features of DPSPs

  1. Guidelines for Legislation: They serve as guidelines for the central and state governments in India to frame laws and policies aimed at achieving social and economic democracy.
  2. Non-justiciable Nature: While DPSPs are fundamental in the governance of the country, they are not enforceable by any court, meaning their implementation is at the discretion of the government.
  3. Moral Obligation: Despite being non-justiciable, DPSPs impose a moral obligation on the State to implement these principles through appropriate legislation and policies.
  4. Supplementary to Fundamental Rights: DPSPs complement Fundamental Rights, aiming to create a balanced approach to governance by addressing both individual liberties and the collective welfare of society.

DPSPs under the Indian Constitution – a Detailed Overview

The provisions related to the DPSPs, as mentioned in Articles 36 to 51 in Part IV of the Indian Constitution are described in detail as follows.

  1. Article 36: Definition of State: This article defines the “State” for the purposes of Part IV, including the government, Parliament, state legislatures, and local authorities.
  2. Article 37: Application of the Principles contained in this Part: While the DPSPs are not enforceable by any court, they are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country and the state is expected to apply these principles in making laws.
  3. Article 38: Social Order for the Promotion of Welfare of the People: This principle emphasizes that the state should strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order that fosters justice, social, economic, and political.
  4. Article 39: Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State: This article includes several sub-principles:
    • Article 39(a): Equal justice and free legal aid to ensure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity.
    • Article 39(b): The ownership and control of material resources of the community should be so distributed as to best subserve the common good.
    • Article 39(c): The operation of the economic system should not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment.
    • Article 39(d): Ensuring that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and women.
    • Article 39(e): The health and strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of children are not abused and citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age or strength.
    • Article 39(f): The children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity.
  5. Article 40: Organisation of village panchayats: This principle encourages the state to organize village panchayats and endow them with the powers and authority necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
  6. Article 41: Right to work, to education, and to public assistance in certain cases: This principle states that the state shall make provisions for securing the right to work, to education, and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness, and disablement.
  7. Article 42: Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief: The state is directed to make provisions for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.
  8. Article 43: Living wage, etc., for workers: The state is directed to secure for all workers, agricultural, industrial, or otherwise, a living wage, conditions of work ensuring a decent standard of life, and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities.
  9. Article 43A: Participation of workers in the management of industries: This article was inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, and it directs the state to promote the participation of workers in the management of industries.
  10. Article 44: Uniform civil code for the citizens: The state shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
  11. Article 45: Provision for free and compulsory education for children: The state shall endeavor to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.
  12. Article 46: Promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other weaker sections: The state shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other weaker sections of the society.
  13. Article 47: Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to improve public health: The state shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties.
  14. Article 48: Organisation of agriculture and animal husbandry: The state shall take steps to organize agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter, of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle.
  15. Article 48A: Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife: This article was inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, and it directs the state to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wildlife.
  16. Article 49: Protection of monuments and places and objects of national importance: The state shall protect every monument or place or object of artistic or historic interest declared by or under law made by Parliament to be of national importance.
  17. Article 50: Separation of judiciary from executive: The state shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the state.
  18. Article 51: Promotion of international peace and security: The state shall endeavor to promote international peace and security, maintain just and honorable relations between nations, foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, and encourage the settlement of international disputes by arbitration.

These principles collectively form a framework for governance that emphasizes social justice, economic development, and the overall welfare of the people. While they are not enforceable in courts, they serve as guiding principles for policymaking and legislative action by the government.

DSPS AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) and Fundamental Rights are two crucial components of the Indian Constitution, each serving distinct but interconnected purposes. Here’s a comparison between the two:

  1. Nature:
    • Directive Principles: DPSPs are non-justiciable in nature, meaning they are not enforceable by courts. They provide guidelines and ideals for the government to strive towards but cannot be legally enforced.
    • Fundamental Rights: Fundamental Rights are justiciable, which means they are legally enforceable. They are rights guaranteed to citizens and can be protected and upheld through legal action in courts.
  2. Purpose:
    • Directive Principles: DPSPs aim to guide the state in its policy-making and governance towards achieving a just and equitable society. They focus on social, economic, and political goals such as social justice, education, health, employment, and environmental protection.
    • Fundamental Rights: Fundamental Rights are individual rights guaranteed to citizens to ensure their freedom, dignity, and equality. These rights protect citizens from arbitrary actions by the state and promote personal liberties, equality before the law, and social justice.
  3. Enforceability:
    • Directive Principles: DPSPs are not legally enforceable, meaning citizens cannot directly go to court to enforce these principles against the government.
    • Fundamental Rights: Fundamental Rights are legally enforceable, and citizens can approach the courts if these rights are violated by the state or any other entity.
  4. Democracy and Governance:
    • Directive Principles: DPSPs contribute to the establishment of a welfare state by guiding the government in formulating policies and laws that promote social and economic justice.
    • Fundamental Rights: Fundamental Rights ensure that citizens have certain basic freedoms and protections against state actions that may infringe upon those freedoms. They are essential for upholding democratic principles and protecting individual liberties.
  5. Scope and Coverage:
    • Directive Principles: DPSPs cover a wide range of socio-economic and political objectives, including education, health, employment, social welfare, environmental protection, and cultural preservation.
    • Fundamental Rights: Fundamental Rights cover individual liberties such as the right to equality, the right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to life and personal liberty, the right against exploitation, the right to freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, and the right to constitutional remedies.
  6. Hierarchy in Case of Conflict:
    • In case of a conflict between DPSPs and Fundamental Rights, the courts generally give precedence to Fundamental Rights over DPSPs. This is because Fundamental Rights are directly enforceable and form the cornerstone of individual freedoms and protections.

In summary, while Directive Principles provide a framework for governance and societal welfare goals, Fundamental Rights ensure the protection of individual liberties and freedoms. Both are integral to the functioning of a democratic and just society, with Fundamental Rights being legally enforceable and DPSPs serving as guiding principles for government policies and actions.

Criticism of Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)

Criticism of Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) often revolves around their non-justiciable nature and the challenges associated with their implementation. Here are some common criticisms:

  1. Non-Justiciability:
    • One of the primary criticisms of DPSP is that they are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be legally enforced by courts. This leads to a lack of accountability as the government is not legally bound to fulfill these principles.
  2. Vagueness and Lack of Clarity:
    • Many DPSPs are criticized for being vague and lacking specificity. They often provide broad guidelines without clear directives on how they should be implemented, leading to ambiguity in policy-making.
  3. Conflict with Fundamental Rights:
    • There can be conflicts between DPSPs and Fundamental Rights, especially when the implementation of DPSPs infringes upon the Fundamental Rights of individuals. Resolving such conflicts becomes challenging due to the non-justiciable nature of DPSPs.
  4. Dependence on Morality:
    • Critics argue that DPSPs rely heavily on moral principles rather than legal enforceability. This raises questions about the practicality and effectiveness of implementing principles that are not legally binding.
  5. Repetition and Overlapping:
    • Some DPSPs are criticized for being repetitive or overlapping with other constitutional provisions or existing laws. This redundancy can lead to confusion and inefficiencies in governance.
  6. Old and Foreign Ideals:
    • Certain DPSPs are based on ideals that are considered outdated or derived from foreign philosophies that may not align with the current socio-economic context of India. Critics argue for the need to update and contextualize these principles.
  7. Lack of Implementation Mechanisms:
    • DPSPs do not specify clear mechanisms or timelines for their implementation. This lack of implementation frameworks can result in delays or ineffective execution of policies aimed at fulfilling DPSP objectives.
  8. Political Promises without Action:
    • Some critics view DPSPs as mere political promises without substantive action. Governments may use DPSPs as rhetoric during elections but fail to translate them into tangible policies and programs.
  9. Need for Legal Enforcement:
    • There are calls for making certain DPSPs justiciable or providing legal mechanisms to ensure their implementation. This would enhance accountability and ensure that governments actively work towards achieving DPSP objectives.

CASE LAWS

  1. Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India (1980): This case dealt with the conflict between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs. The Supreme Court held that Fundamental Rights and DPSPs are complementary and essential for a balanced constitutional scheme. It declared that while DPSPs cannot override Fundamental Rights, they are equally important for achieving socio-economic justice.
  2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that DPSPs are fundamental to the governance of the country and cannot be ignored by the government. The case also established the doctrine of basic structure, stating that Parliament cannot amend the Constitution in a way that alters its basic structure, which includes DPSPs.
  3. State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas (1976): This case addressed the constitutional validity of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, which was challenged on the grounds of violating Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 31 (Right to Property). The Supreme Court upheld the Act, emphasizing the importance of DPSPs in promoting social justice and equitable distribution of resources.
  4. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992): Commonly known as the Mandal Commission case, it involved the implementation of reservations in public employment based on caste. The Supreme Court upheld the government’s decision, citing DPSPs such as promoting social justice and equality of opportunity as valid grounds for affirmative action.
  5. Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. (1996): This case focused on the right to education and the state’s obligation to provide free and compulsory education to children under Article 45 of the Constitution (a DPSP). The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of DPSPs in guiding legislative action to achieve social welfare objectives.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) play a crucial role in shaping the governance and policy framework of India. While they are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be enforced by courts, they serve as guiding principles for the government in formulating laws and policies that promote social justice, economic welfare, and overall development. DPSPs complement Fundamental Rights and together form the cornerstone of India’s constitutional ethos.

Criticism of DPSPs often revolves around their non-enforceability and the perception that they are merely moral directives without clear implementation mechanisms. However, their significance lies in providing a roadmap for a just and equitable society, reflecting the ideals and aspirations of the Constitution’s framers.

Recent amendments related to DPSPs would need to be verified from updated legal sources, as my information is current only up to January 2022. Overall, DPSPs remain an integral part of India’s constitutional framework, guiding the state towards fulfilling its responsibilities to its citizens and promoting the common good.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Public Interest Litigation: Empowering citizens through judiciary

Sommya Kashyap
-
0
Public Interest Litigation: Empowering citizens through judiciary

Introduction

The traditional image of the judiciary often portrays it as a solemn arbiter settling disputes between individuals. However, in India, the concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has revolutionized this perception. PIL empowers citizens to hold the state accountable and advocate for the rights of those who may not have the resources or voice to do so themselves.

This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of PIL in India. We will delve into its historical background, the legal framework that enables it, and the transformative impact it has had on Indian society. By examining PIL, we gain a deeper understanding of how the judiciary can be a powerful tool for social change and empowerment.

Background

Prior to the emergence of PIL, access to justice for marginalized communities in India was often limited. Legal proceedings were expensive and complex, leaving many voiceless in the face of injustice. However, the seeds of change were sown in the 1970s:

  • Shifting Judicial Activism: The Indian judiciary, under the leadership of progressive judges like Chief Justice P. N. Bhagwati, began to adopt a more activist approach. This paved the way for recognizing PIL as a legitimate tool for social justice.
  • Landmark Case (1979): The case of Hussainara Khatoon laid the foundation for PIL. The Supreme Court, recognizing the plight of undertrial prisoners, directed states to improve prison conditions. This case established the precedent for using courts to address systemic issues and public welfare concerns.
  • Constitutional Framework: While the Indian Constitution doesn’t explicitly mention PIL, it provides fertile ground for its existence. Articles 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies) and 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) empower the courts to take cognizance of public interest matters.

The emergence of PIL marked a significant shift in the Indian legal landscape. It transformed the judiciary from a passive observer to an active participant in ensuring social justice and upholding the rule of law.

Meaning of PIL

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a unique concept in the Indian legal system that empowers ordinary citizens to fight for the greater good. Unlike traditional lawsuits focused on individual disputes, PIL allows anyone – a concerned citizen, a social activist, or even an NGO – to file a petition in court on behalf of a larger public interest. Imagine PIL as a legal tool that gives a voice to the voiceless.

Here’s how PIL makes a difference:

  • Breaking Barriers to Justice: India’s vast population and economic inequalities often leave many vulnerable to injustice. Legal processes can be expensive and complex, hindering access to justice for marginalized communities. PIL bridges this gap by allowing public-spirited individuals to fight for the rights of those who can’t afford it themselves. This ensures critical issues like environmental pollution, violation of labor rights, or discrimination against underprivileged groups reach the courts.

  • Safeguarding Fundamental Rights: The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens. However, ensuring these rights are a reality requires constant vigilance. PIL acts as a watchdog, empowering citizens to challenge government actions that infringe upon these rights. Cases on issues like prison overcrowding, denial of education, or forced evictions highlight the role of PIL in safeguarding the fundamental rights of all Indians.

  • Holding the Government Accountable: A healthy democracy thrives on transparency and accountability. PIL allows citizens to scrutinize the actions (or inactions) of the government. Petitions can be filed against issues like corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, or failure to implement welfare schemes effectively. This judicial scrutiny compels the government to be more transparent and accountable to the public it serves.

In essence, PIL is a powerful tool that promotes social justice in multiple ways. It empowers citizens, upholds fundamental rights, ensures government accountability, and fosters social welfare. By addressing these objectives, PIL has played a transformative role in shaping a more just and equitable India.

How PIL is Empowering citizens through the judiciary?

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has emerged as a powerful tool in the Indian legal system, empowering citizens to hold the government accountable and champion social justice. Unlike traditional litigation focused on individual grievances, PIL allows any public-spirited individual or organization to bring a case to court on behalf of a larger public interest. Understanding the objectives of PIL sheds light on its transformative impact on Indian society.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) acts as a bridge between citizens and the judiciary, empowering people in several ways:

1. Access to Justice for All: The Indian legal system can be expensive and complex. PIL allows anyone, even those without significant resources, to file a petition on behalf of a larger public interest. This ensures that marginalized communities and individuals who wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford legal representation can have their voices heard in court on issues like environmental degradation, labor rights violations, or discrimination.

2. Upholding Fundamental Rights: The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, but their enforcement requires vigilance. PIL empowers citizens to challenge government actions that infringe upon these rights. Cases addressing prison overcrowding, denial of education, or forced evictions showcase how PIL helps safeguard the fundamental rights of all Indians.

3. Holding the Government Accountable: A healthy democracy thrives on transparency and accountability. PIL allows citizens to scrutinize the government’s actions and inactions. Petitions can be filed against issues like corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, or failure to implement welfare schemes effectively. This judicial scrutiny compels the government to be more transparent and accountable to the public it serves.

4. Enforcing Social Welfare: The reach of PIL extends beyond individual rights, encompassing broader societal concerns. PIL petitions have addressed issues like environmental pollution, wildlife conservation, and public health emergencies. This has led to landmark court orders directing the government to take necessary steps for environmental protection, ensuring healthcare accessibility, and promoting public welfare in general.

5. Shaping Public Policy: Through PIL judgments, courts often lay down guidelines and principles for the government to follow while formulating policies. These pronouncements set precedents and influence future lawmaking. PIL has played a crucial role in shaping public policy on issues like child labor, women’s empowerment, and disability rights, promoting positive social change through the judicial process.

Empowerment through the Judiciary:

The judiciary acts as a platform for citizens to raise public interest issues. By filing PILs, citizens can bring these issues to the court’s attention, seek legal remedies, and potentially influence government policies through court orders. This empowers citizens to participate actively in shaping a more just and equitable society.

In essence, PIL acts as a powerful tool in the hands of the Indian public to hold the government accountable, fight for social justice, and advocate for positive change.

PIL under The Constitution of India 

The concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) isn’t explicitly defined within the Indian Constitution itself. However, the framework for PIL is derived from two key aspects of the Constitution:

  1. Fundamental Rights (Articles 14-32): These articles guarantee fundamental rights like equality, right to life and liberty, and freedom of speech to all Indian citizens. PIL empowers individuals to file petitions in courts (usually the Supreme Court under Article 32 or the High Courts under Article 226) when they believe the government’s actions violate these fundamental rights of a large section of the population, even if they themselves aren’t directly affected.

  2. Power of Judicial Review: The Indian judiciary has the inherent power of judicial review, allowing it to scrutinize the actions of the legislature and executive to ensure they comply with the Constitution. PIL leverages this power by enabling public-spirited individuals to bring issues of public interest to the court’s attention. These issues could involve the violation of fundamental rights through government actions or inaction, or even matters related to social welfare and environmental protection.

Here’s a breakdown of some key points about PIL and the Indian Constitution:

  • Who can file a PIL? Any Indian citizen or organization with a “sufficient interest” in the public issue can file a PIL petition.

  • Who are PILs filed against? PILs are typically filed against the government (central or state), municipal authorities, or other public bodies, not private individuals.

In other words, PIL serves as a powerful tool under the Indian Constitution, even without explicit mention. It empowers citizens to hold the government accountable, uphold fundamental rights, and promote social justice.

PIL Shaping Indian Legal System

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has revolutionized the Indian legal system, empowering citizens to address social issues and hold authorities accountable. Here’s a glimpse into some landmark PIL cases that have shaped the course of Indian society:

  • Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar (1979): This case, often considered the foundation of PIL in India, brought to light the plight of undertrial prisoners languishing in jails for years without trial. The Supreme Court’s intervention led to the release of thousands of prisoners and highlighted the need for speedy trials, setting a precedent for PILs focusing on prison reforms.

  • Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985): This case addressed the rights of slum dwellers facing forced eviction by the Mumbai municipality. The Supreme Court recognized the right to shelter as a fundamental right and emphasized the need for proper rehabilitation before eviction, safeguarding the rights of marginalized communities.

  • M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case) (1987): Following a gas leak disaster in Delhi, this PIL case exposed the dangers of industrial pollution. The Supreme Court laid down the principle of “absolute liability” for industries, making them strictly responsible for any environmental damage caused. This case set a significant precedent for environmental protection through PIL.

  • Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997): This case addressed the issue of sexual harassment at the workplace. In the absence of a specific law, the Supreme Court laid down detailed guidelines for preventing and punishing sexual harassment, creating a landmark legal framework for workplace safety for women.

  • Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India (2014): This case involved the disappearance and alleged custodial torture of two brothers in Delhi. The PIL led to a reinvestigation of the case and highlighted the need for police reforms and addressing custodial brutality.

These are just a few examples of the profound impact PIL has had on Indian society. Here’s how these cases showcase the power of PIL:

  • Protecting Fundamental Rights: PILs like Hussainara Khatoon and Olga Tellis ensured access to justice and protected the fundamental rights of marginalized groups.

  • Environmental Protection: Cases like M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India have been instrumental in holding industries accountable for environmental pollution and promoting environmental protection.

  • Social Justice: PILs like Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan have addressed social issues like sexual harassment and paved the way for creating a more equitable society.

  • Police Reforms: Cases like Parmanand Katara highlight the potential of PIL in bringing about reforms in crucial areas like the justice system and police accountability.

PIL has undoubtedly empowered citizens to champion social causes, ensuring a more accountable government and a more just society. However, it’s important to acknowledge ongoing challenges like frivolous PILs clogging court systems and the need for effective implementation of court orders. Despite these limitations, PIL remains a powerful tool for positive change in India.

Criticism To PIL

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has undoubtedly been a transformative force in India. However, it’s not without its critics. Here’s a look at some of the key criticisms of PIL:

  • Frivolous Petitions: One major concern is the filing of frivolous PILs that lack merit and burden the already overloaded court system. This can delay justice in genuine cases.

  • Misuse for Personal Gain: Critics argue that PIL can be misused for personal vendettas or publicity stunts, diverting attention from genuine public interest issues.

  • Lack of Implementation: Court orders issued in PIL cases may not be effectively implemented by the government, rendering them toothless. This undermines public faith in the PIL system.

  • Overreach by Judiciary: Some argue that PIL allows the judiciary to overstep its boundaries and dictate policy matters, which is the domain of the legislature.

  • Focus on Urban Issues: Critics point out that PILs often focus on urban problems, neglecting the needs of rural areas and marginalized communities.

Conclusion

Despite these criticisms, PIL remains a crucial tool for social justice in India. Here’s how we can ensure its continued effectiveness:

  • Stricter Scrutiny of Petitions: Courts can implement stricter procedures to weed out frivolous PILs and focus on genuine public interest issues.

  • Promoting Responsible PIL: Civil society organizations and legal professionals can play a role in educating the public about responsible use of PIL.

  • Improved Implementation Mechanisms: Stronger mechanisms are needed to ensure that government bodies effectively implement court orders issued through PIL cases.

  • Collaborative Governance: A more collaborative approach between the judiciary, legislature, and executive can address the concerns of judicial overreach.

  • Focus on Rural Issues: Strategies can be developed to encourage PILs that address the challenges faced by rural communities.

In conclusion, PIL is a powerful tool that requires constant evaluation and improvement. By addressing the existing criticisms and fostering responsible use, PIL can continue to be a beacon of hope for a more just and equitable India.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution: Guardian of Democracy

Sommya Kashyap
-
0
Fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution: Guardian of Democracy

Introduction 

Fundamental rights are the bedrock of any democratic society, serving as the cornerstone of individual liberties and freedoms. In the context of India, fundamental rights are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution, spanning Articles 12 to 35. These rights are guaranteed to every citizen, irrespective of caste, creed, religion, or gender, and are aimed at ensuring their dignity, freedom, and overall well-being.

At their core, fundamental rights embody the principles of equality, justice, and liberty, forming the essence of a democratic society. They encompass a diverse range of rights, including the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, protection against exploitation, freedom of religion, and cultural and educational rights, among others.

Fundamental rights act as a check on the power of the government, safeguarding individuals from arbitrary state action and ensuring that their inherent rights are protected. They empower citizens to lead a life of dignity and autonomy, fostering a society that upholds the principles of justice, equality, and fraternity.

In India, the judiciary plays a pivotal role in interpreting and enforcing fundamental rights, thereby ensuring their effective implementation. Through landmark judgments and legal interventions, the courts uphold the sanctity of these rights, ensuring that they remain inviolable and sacrosanct.

Overall, fundamental rights represent the collective aspirations of a democratic society, reflecting its commitment to uphold the principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all its citizens. They serve as a bulwark against tyranny and oppression, embodying the very essence of a free and democratic nation.

Background of Fundamental Rights

Inspired by: The Indian Constitution drew inspiration from various sources, including the Magna Carta, the US Bill of Rights, and the Government of India Act, 1935.

  • denominations the right to manage their own affairs in matters of religion.
  • Article 27: Freedom to attend religious instructions or worship in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State: Allows individuals to attend religious instructions or worship in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State, subject to the right of conscience and religious freedom of all persons.
  • Article 28: Freedom from taxation for promotion of particular religion: Prohibits the imposition of any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.

The concept of fundamental rights has its roots in the age-old struggle for human dignity and liberty. Throughout history, individuals and societies have fought against oppression, tyranny, and injustice, seeking to secure certain inalienable rights that are essential for human flourishing.

The idea of fundamental rights gained significant prominence during the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries, as philosophers and thinkers championed the principles of individual liberty, equality, and justice. Influential figures such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Thomas Paine articulated the notion that every human being possesses inherent rights that are not granted by the state but are instead intrinsic to their humanity.

The French Revolution of 1789 and the American Revolution of 1776 marked watershed moments in the struggle for fundamental rights. The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and the United States Bill of Rights enshrined key principles such as freedom of speech, assembly, and religion, laying the foundation for modern concepts of constitutionalism and democracy.

In the aftermath of World War II, the horrors of totalitarianism and mass atrocities underscored the urgent need for an international framework to protect human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, articulated a comprehensive set of rights and freedoms that are inherent to all human beings, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, or religion.

In the context of India, the struggle for independence from British colonial rule was deeply intertwined with the quest for fundamental rights. Visionaries such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and B.R. Ambedkar envisioned a free and democratic India where every citizen would enjoy certain basic liberties and protections.

The framers of the Indian Constitution, led by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, drew inspiration from various sources, including the UDHR, the constitutions of other democracies, and India’s own rich history and cultural heritage, to codify a comprehensive framework of fundamental rights. Part III of the Indian Constitution, comprising Articles 12 to 35, enshrines these rights and serves as a bulwark against arbitrary state action and injustice.

Fundamental rights in India encompass a wide array of freedoms, including the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, right against exploitation, freedom of religion, and cultural and educational rights. They reflect the commitment of the Indian state to uphold the principles of justice, liberty, and fraternity, and empower citizens to lead lives of dignity, autonomy, and fulfillment.

Characteristics of Fundamental Rights:

  • Fundamental: These rights are foundational for a just and equitable society, crucial for the development of a person’s personality and a dignified life.
  • Enforceable: Unlike ordinary rights, they are justiciable, meaning individuals can seek judicial intervention through writs (like habeas corpus) to enforce them if violated.
  • Guaranteed by the Constitution: Their existence and protection are not dependent on the benevolence of the legislature or executive; they are constitutionally mandated.
  • Not Absolute: While fundamental, these rights are not absolute. Reasonable restrictions can be imposed by the legislature through laws, provided such restrictions are:
    • Authorized by the Constitution: The specific Article granting the right must allow for reasonable restrictions.
    • Proportionate: The restriction must be necessary to achieve a legitimate State aim and not excessively curtail the right.

Where can you find Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution?

In the Indian Constitution, fundamental rights are enshrined in Part III, which comprises Articles 12 to 35. This part of the Constitution is dedicated to safeguarding and guaranteeing certain basic rights and freedoms to all citizens of India. The framers of the Constitution considered these rights essential for the development of individual personality and the preservation of human dignity.

  1. Part III: Fundamental Rights: This is the main section of the Constitution where fundamental rights are explicitly enumerated. Articles 12 to 35 outline various rights and protections granted to citizens, including the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, right against exploitation, freedom of religion, and cultural and educational rights.
  2. Article 12: Definition: Article 12 provides a definition of the term “State” as used in Part III. It clarifies that “State” includes the Government of India, the government and Parliament of each state, and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.
  3. Article 13: Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights: Article 13 establishes the supremacy of fundamental rights by declaring that any law that violates or abridges these rights shall be void to the extent of such inconsistency. It also defines the term “law” to include various legal instruments and clarifies the scope of laws covered under this provision.
  4. Subsequent Articles (14-35): Following Article 13, the subsequent articles in Part III detail specific fundamental rights along with their scope, limitations, and exceptions. These include rights to equality, freedom, protection against exploitation, freedom of religion, and cultural and educational rights.

Overall, Part III of the Indian Constitution occupies a central position in ensuring that the principles of justice, liberty, and equality are upheld in Indian society. It provides citizens with a mechanism to protect their rights and liberties, thereby fostering a democratic and egalitarian society.

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 

  1. Right to Equality (Articles 14-18):
    • Article 14: It ensures equality before the law and equal protection of laws within the territory of India. This means that the State cannot deny any person equality before the law or discriminate against any individual in the application of laws.
    • Article 15: It prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, or any of them. It ensures that no citizen is discriminated against in access to public places or in matters of employment.
    • Article 16: It guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. It prevents discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, or residence in government employment.
    • Article 17: It abolishes “Untouchability” and prohibits its practice in any form. It makes the enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” punishable by law.
    • Article 18: It abolishes titles of nobility and prohibits the State from conferring titles, except military and academic distinctions. It prevents citizens from accepting titles from foreign states.
  2. Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22):
    • Article 19: It grants six freedoms to citizens: freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement, residence, and profession, subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty, integrity, security of the State, public order, decency, or morality.
    • Article 20: It protects individuals against arbitrary and excessive punishment. It includes the right against ex post facto laws, double jeopardy, and self-incrimination.
    • Article 21: It guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty. It ensures that no person shall be deprived of their life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.
    • Article 21A: It provides for the right to education for children between the ages of 6 and 14 years. The State is mandated to provide free and compulsory education to all children within this age group.
    • Article 22: It safeguards individuals’ rights when arrested or detained. It includes provisions such as the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
  3. Right against Exploitation (Articles 23-24):
    • Article 23: It prohibits trafficking in human beings, beggar, and other forms of forced labor. It also allows the State to impose compulsory service for public purposes but prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, or class.
    • Article 24: It prohibits the employment of children below the age of fourteen years in factories, mines, or any other hazardous employment.
  4. Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28):
    • Article 25: It guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality, and health. It also allows the State to regulate economic, financial, political, or secular activities associated with religious practice.
    • Article 26: It grants religious denominations the right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes, manage their own affairs in matters of religion, and own and acquire property.
    • Article 27: Freedom to attend religious instructions or worship in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State: Allows individuals to attend religious instructions or worship in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State, subject to the right of conscience and religious freedom of all persons.
    • Article 28: Freedom from taxation for promotion of particular religion: Prohibits the imposition of any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.

    • Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30):

      • Article 29: Cultural and Educational Rights of Minorities: Protects the interests of minorities regarding their distinct culture, language, and education.
      • Article 30: Right of Minorities to Administer Educational Institutions: Allows minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

      Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32):

      • Article 32: Right to Enforcement of Fundamental Rights: Empowers individuals to approach the Supreme Court for the protection of their fundamental rights if violated. This is crucial for ensuring the enforceability of these rights.
      • Habeas Corpus:
        • Meaning: The term “Habeas Corpus” originates from Latin, meaning “to have the body of.” In legal terms, it refers to a writ that empowers a court to demand the presence of a person who is allegedly detained or imprisoned, allowing the court to determine the legality of their detention. The primary purpose of this writ is to protect individuals against unlawful or arbitrary detention by authorities.
        • Application: Habeas Corpus is a fundamental legal principle that safeguards individual liberty. When someone is detained, whether by law enforcement or any other authority, they have the right to challenge the legality of their detention through this writ. The court examines whether the detention complies with legal procedures and substantive laws, ensuring that no one is unlawfully deprived of their freedom.
      • Certiorari:
        • Meaning: “Certiorari” is a Latin term that translates to “to be certified.” In legal contexts, it refers to a writ issued by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court, tribunal, or administrative body. The purpose of Certiorari is to ensure that legal proceedings are conducted correctly and that decisions are based on proper interpretation and application of the law.
        • Application: Certiorari is commonly used in the context of judicial review, where a higher court examines the legality and correctness of decisions made by lower courts or administrative agencies. It allows parties dissatisfied with a lower court’s decision to seek a review by a higher authority, ensuring fair and consistent application of legal principles.
      • Prohibition:
        • Meaning: The writ of “Prohibition” is a legal order issued by a higher court to prevent a lower court, tribunal, or administrative body from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting beyond its legal authority. It aims to halt proceedings that are deemed unlawful or outside the scope of the governing law.
        • Application: Prohibition is invoked when there is a concern that a lower court or administrative body is acting beyond its legal powers or violating procedural rules. The higher court issues this writ to restrain the lower authority from proceeding further in a case or taking actions that are not legally permitted.
      • Mandamus:
        • Meaning: “Mandamus,” which means “We command” in Latin, is a writ issued by a court to compel a public official, government agency, or corporation to perform a specific duty that they are legally obligated to perform but have failed or refused to do so.
        • Application: Mandamus is utilized when a person or entity seeks judicial intervention to enforce a legal duty or right. It commands the responsible party to take action and fulfill its legal obligations, ensuring compliance with the law and preventing neglect or abuse of power by public authorities.
      • Quo Warranto:
        • Meaning: “Quo Warranto,” translating to “By what authority or warrant” in Latin, is a legal remedy used to challenge the validity of a person holding a public office or position. It questions the authority by which an individual holds a particular office or position.
        • Application: Quo Warranto is employed to address situations where there are doubts or disputes regarding the eligibility or legality of someone occupying a public office. It allows the court to inquire into the authority or right of the person to hold that office, ensuring that public positions are filled lawfully and with proper authority.

DOCTRINES 

These are the two key doctrines related to fundamental rights-

  1. Doctrine of Severability:
    • Definition: The doctrine of severability, also known as the doctrine of separability, is a legal principle that determines the validity of a statute or law when part of it is found to be unconstitutional or in violation of fundamental rights.
    • Explanation: According to this doctrine, if a law contains provisions that are inconsistent with fundamental rights or other constitutional provisions, only those specific provisions that are in conflict will be deemed void. The rest of the law remains valid and enforceable.
    • Application: For example, if a law has ten provisions, and one of these provisions is found to violate the right to equality, only that particular provision will be struck down as unconstitutional. The remaining nine provisions will continue to be in effect.
    • Significance: The doctrine of severability ensures that even if a part of a law is unconstitutional, the entire law is not invalidated. It allows for the preservation of valid and legal provisions while eliminating those that are contrary to constitutional principles.
  2. Doctrine of Eclipse:
    • Definition: The doctrine of eclipse is a legal principle that deals with the status of pre-constitutional laws or statutes that were enacted before the Constitution came into force and are found to be inconsistent with fundamental rights.
    • Explanation: According to this doctrine, if a pre-constitutional law violates fundamental rights, it is not null and void from the beginning (ab initio). Instead, it becomes inactive or “eclipsed” to the extent of its inconsistency with fundamental rights.
    • Application: When a fundamental right is violated by a pre-constitutional law, the law is not automatically struck down. Instead, it remains dormant or inactive insofar as it contradicts fundamental rights. If the conflicting fundamental right is removed or amended, the law becomes active again.
    • Significance: The doctrine of eclipse provides a mechanism for dealing with pre-existing laws that are incompatible with fundamental rights without outright nullifying them. It allows for the revival of such laws if and when the constitutional inconsistency is resolved.

These doctrines play a crucial role in constitutional interpretation and the application of fundamental rights in India’s legal framework. They ensure a nuanced approach to addressing legal conflicts while preserving the integrity of both the Constitution and existing laws.

CASE LAWS

  1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):
    • Issue: Review of Golak Nath case and the scope of Parliament’s amending power vis-a-vis Fundamental Rights.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court introduced the “basic structure” doctrine, stating that while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure, which includes democracy, rule of law, and judicial review.
  2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975):
    • Issue: Validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act and election disputes.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court added new features to the basic structure doctrine, emphasizing the importance of the rule of law, democracy, and judicial review.
  3. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):
    • Issue: Impoundment of passport and violation of fundamental rights.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court held that any procedure under Article 21 must be fair, reasonable, and not arbitrary, extending the scope of procedural due process under the Constitution.
  4. A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950):
    • Issue: The validity of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, and its compliance with fundamental rights.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the validity of preventive detention but ruled that the grounds of detention must be disclosed to the detainee. Section 14 of the Act, which prohibited such disclosure, was struck down.
  5. Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1952):
    • Issue: Constitutional validity of the First Amendment of 1951, which curtailed the right to property.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court held that Parliament has the power to amend fundamental rights under Article 368, including curtailment of the right to property.
  6. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967):
    • Issue: Parliament’s authority to amend Fundamental Rights, particularly regarding property rights.
    • Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that Parliament cannot curtail Fundamental Rights, marking a significant limitation on the amending power of Parliament

CONCLUSION

The journey of fundamental rights in India reflects a profound evolution in legal thought and constitutional interpretation. From the early challenges posed by cases like A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, where the scope of preventive detention and the interplay of constitutional articles were tested, to the landmark decisions that established the “basic structure” doctrine, the trajectory has been one of defining and defending individual liberties within the framework of a democratic republic.

One of the defining aspects of this journey is the role of judicial review. Courts have consistently acted as guardians of fundamental rights, ensuring that legislative and executive actions adhere to the constitutional guarantees enshrined in Articles 14, 19, and 21, among others. The power of the judiciary to review and strike down laws or actions that violate fundamental rights has been pivotal in upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens from arbitrary state action.

The scope of parliamentary amendments to fundamental rights has also been a subject of intense legal scrutiny. Cases such as Golak Nath v. State of Punjab and Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala delineated the boundaries of parliamentary authority, affirming that while Parliament can amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter its “basic structure.” This concept, crystallized through judicial pronouncements, safeguards core constitutional principles from arbitrary changes.

The notion of the “basic structure” embodies foundational elements of the Constitution that are immutable, forming the bedrock of India’s democratic ethos. These include principles like democracy, rule of law, separation of powers, and judicial review. The judiciary’s role in defining and protecting this basic structure has been instrumental in preserving the integrity and values of the Constitution.

Furthermore, the dynamic interpretation of fundamental rights has ensured their relevance and adaptability to evolving societal norms and global human rights standards. Cases like Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India underscore the importance of procedural fairness and reasonableness in administrative actions, expanding the scope of Article 21 to encompass broader notions of liberty and due process.

In essence, fundamental rights represent the heart and soul of India’s constitutional democracy. They are not just legal provisions but embody the aspirations of a free and just society, where the rights and dignity of every individual are sacrosanct. The judiciary’s vigilant oversight, coupled with a dynamic and principled interpretation of these rights, continues to be paramount in upholding the constitutional vision of justice, liberty, and equality for all citizens.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

The Role of the Judiciary in Upholding the Indian Constitution

Dimple Kanojiya
-
0
The Role of the Judiciary in Upholding the Indian Constitution

The Role of the Judiciary in Upholding the Indian Constitution

The judiciary is the guardian of the Indian Constitution. It serves as the custodian of individual liberties and ensures that the rule of law prevails.” – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Introduction

The judiciary in India serves as a cornerstone of democratic governance, ensuring that the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land. As an independent and impartial body, it safeguards the rights and freedoms of individuals while maintaining a check on the powers of the executive and legislature. This article delves deeper into the diverse and unique roles played by the judiciary in upholding the Indian Constitution

Supreme Court of India:

As the Apex judicial body in the country, the Supreme Court has original, appellate, and advisory jurisdiction. It hears appeals from lower courts and tribunals, and it also has the power of judicial review over laws and executive actions.

High Courts:

Each state in India has its own High Court, which serves as the highest court of appeal within the state’s jurisdiction. High Courts have original, appellate, and writ jurisdiction, and they adjudicate on matters related to both civil and criminal law.

District Courts:

District Courts are the lowest tier of the judiciary at the district level. They handle civil and criminal cases within their respective districts and serve as the primary trial courts in India.

Subordinate Courts:

Below the District Courts are various subordinate courts, including Civil Courts, Criminal Courts, and Family Courts. These courts operate at the taluk or tehsil level and handle cases falling within their jurisdiction.

Specialized Tribunals:

India has numerous specialized tribunals established to adjudicate on specific areas of law, such as administrative law, taxation, labor disputes, environmental matters, and intellectual property rights. Examples include the National Green Tribunal (NGT), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), and the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

Constitutional Courts:

The judiciary in India also includes constitutional courts, such as the High Courts and the Supreme Court, which have the authority to interpret the Constitution and strike down laws inconsistent with its provisions.

Panchayat Courts:

In rural areas, Panchayat Courts, also known as Gram Nyayalayas, provide localized dispute resolution mechanisms for certain types of civil and criminal cases at the village level.

Juvenile Justice Boards:

These specialized courts are responsible for handling cases involving juveniles in conflict with the law, ensuring that juvenile offenders receive appropriate care, protection, and rehabilitation.

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC):

While not a traditional court, the NHRC serves as a quasi-judicial body with the authority to investigate human rights violations and recommend remedial measures.

Armed Forces Tribunals:

These tribunals have jurisdiction over matters related to members of the armed forces, providing a specialized forum for resolving disputes and grievances within the military justice system.

These various types of judiciary collectively form the legal framework of India, providing avenues for dispute resolution, protection of rights, and upholding the rule of law in the country.

Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions

The judiciary’s primary function is to interpret the Constitution. This involves not just a literal reading of its text but understanding its spirit and underlying principles. The judiciary ensures that the interpretation of the Constitution adapts to the changing needs and aspirations of society. Through judicial precedents and doctrines, such as the “basic structure” doctrine established in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the judiciary protects the core values of the Constitution from amendments that could undermine its essence.

Expanding the Scope of Fundamental Rights

The judiciary has played a crucial role in expanding the scope of fundamental rights. Through progressive interpretations, the courts have broadened the ambit of rights to include various dimensions of personal liberty and social justice. For instance, the right to privacy was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was recognized by the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.

Judicial Activism and Social Justice

Judicial activism refers to the proactive role played by the judiciary in addressing public grievances and ensuring justice, often stepping in where other branches of government may have failed. This activism is evident in the use of Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which has democratized access to justice. PILs have been instrumental in addressing issues such as environmental degradation, human rights violations, and corruption. Cases like the Vishaka Guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace highlight the judiciary’s role in filling legislative voids and setting standards for social justice.

Strengthening Democracy and Electoral Integrity

The judiciary also plays a vital role in maintaining the integrity of the democratic process. It adjudicates on matters related to electoral malpractices and the eligibility of candidates. Through judgments in cases like S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, the judiciary has ensured that the principles of democracy and federalism are respected, preventing the misuse of constitutional provisions for political gains.

Check on Arbitrary Powers

The judiciary acts as a bulwark against the arbitrary use of power by the state. By reviewing executive actions and legislative measures, it ensures that they conform to constitutional norms. The concept of “due process of law,” as evolved through various judgments, ensures that any deprivation of life or liberty must be fair, just, and reasonable. This was significantly emphasized in the Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India case, which expanded the interpretation of Article 21 to include the right to travel abroad.

Enhancing Transparency and Accountability

Transparency and accountability in governance are vital for a functioning democracy. The judiciary, through its judgments, has compelled greater transparency in government functioning. For instance, in the landmark case of the Right to Information Act, the judiciary played a crucial role in interpreting the law to ensure that citizens have access to information, thus promoting accountability.

Protecting Minority Rights

The judiciary has been at the forefront of protecting the rights of minorities and marginalized communities. By ensuring that their rights are not trampled upon by the majority or by the state, the judiciary upholds the constitutional promise of equality and non-discrimination. Landmark judgments like the decriminalization of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India have reinforced the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals.

Environmental Jurisprudence

Environmental protection has emerged as a significant area of judicial intervention. The judiciary has recognized the right to a healthy environment as part of the right to life under Article 21. Through various judgments, including the establishment of the National Green Tribunal, the judiciary has actively worked towards sustainable development and the protection of natural resources.

Advancing Social Justice and Equality

The judiciary has been instrumental in promoting social justice and equality, essential components of the Indian Constitution. Through landmark judgments, the judiciary has addressed issues of caste discrimination, gender inequality, and the rights of marginalized communities. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Indra Sawhney case, which upheld reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs), is a prime example of judicial intervention to promote social equity.

In cases like the Shayara Bano v. Union of India, where the practice of instant triple talaq was declared unconstitutional, the judiciary has taken bold steps to ensure gender justice and protect the rights of women. Similarly, the recognition of transgender rights in the National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India case highlights the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals, irrespective of their gender identity

Ensuring Constitutional Supremacy

The judiciary’s primary role is to maintain the supremacy of the Constitution. Through its power of judicial review, it ensures that all laws and executive actions comply with the constitutional framework. The judiciary can strike down any legislation or executive order that contradicts constitutional principles. This role is crucial in preventing the erosion of constitutional values and ensuring that all state actions are bound by the rule of law.

Dynamic Interpretation of the Constitution

The judiciary’s interpretation of the Constitution is dynamic, allowing it to adapt to evolving societal needs and challenges. This dynamic approach ensures that the Constitution remains relevant and effective in addressing contemporary issues. For instance, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, has expanded to include rights such as the right to education, health, and a clean environment, reflecting the changing priorities and values of society.

Balancing Federalism

India’s federal structure necessitates a careful balance of power between the central and state governments. The judiciary plays a pivotal role in maintaining this balance, ensuring that neither level of government oversteps its constitutional boundaries. Through its judgments, the Supreme Court clarifies the distribution of powers and resolves conflicts that arise between the center and the states. This judicial oversight is crucial in maintaining the federal equilibrium and ensuring that the autonomy of state governments is respected.

Strengthening the Electoral Process

The judiciary has a significant role in safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process, which is the foundation of democracy. It adjudicates on matters related to electoral malpractices, candidate eligibility, and the conduct of elections. The judiciary’s intervention in cases of electoral fraud and its efforts to ensure free and fair elections uphold the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution. For example, the Supreme Court’s directive to introduce the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) system aims to enhance transparency and credibility in the electoral process.

Upholding Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms is at the core of the judiciary’s mandate. Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution empower the Supreme Court and High Courts to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The judiciary’s proactive stance in safeguarding these rights is evident in numerous landmark cases. In the Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court expanded the interpretation of Article 21, emphasizing that any law affecting personal liberty must be “right, just, and fair.”

Promoting Environmental Protection

Environmental jurisprudence is a vital area where the judiciary has made significant contributions. Recognizing the right to a healthy environment as an integral part of the right to life, the judiciary has passed numerous judgments to protect natural resources and promote sustainable development. The establishment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is a testament to the judiciary’s commitment to environmental protection. The Supreme Court’s interventions in cases like the Ganga Pollution case and the Oleum Gas Leak case have set important precedents for environmental accountability and governance.

Ensuring Accountability and Good Governance

The judiciary plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability and good governance. Through its oversight functions, the judiciary checks the misuse of power by public officials and institutions. Landmark cases such as Vineet Narain v. Union of India, which led to the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission, demonstrate the judiciary’s role in promoting transparency and accountability. By scrutinizing government actions and ensuring compliance with the law, the judiciary upholds the principles of good governance.

Facilitating Access to Justice

Access to justice is a fundamental aspect of the judiciary’s role. The judiciary has taken several measures to make justice more accessible to the common people. The introduction of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has democratized access to the courts, allowing individuals and organizations to seek redressal for public grievances without the traditional constraints of locus standi. This has enabled the judiciary to address a wide range of social issues and ensure that justice is not denied due to technicalities or procedural hurdles.

“The Indian Constitution is a testament to our commitment to justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. The judiciary’s role in upholding these values is crucial in preserving the fabric of our democracy.” – Justice P. N. Bhagwati

Conclusion

The Indian judiciary’s role in upholding the Indian Constitution is both expansive and profound. Through its interpretation and enforcement of constitutional provisions, protection of fundamental rights, promotion of social justice, and maintenance of federal balance, the judiciary ensures that the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land. Its proactive stance in addressing contemporary challenges, promoting transparency, and ensuring accountability further underscores its critical position in the democratic governance of India. As the nation continues to evolve, the judiciary’s unwavering commitment to upholding constitutional values and principles will remain essential in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all citizens.

At the apex sits the Supreme Court of India, the highest judicial authority, endowed with the power of judicial review and appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and tribunals. It serves as the guardian of the Indian Constitution, ensuring that laws and executive actions adhere to constitutional principles and values.

The High Courts, established in each state, provide a forum for appellate and original jurisdiction, handling a wide range of civil and criminal cases within their territorial jurisdiction. District Courts and subordinate courts play a pivotal role in adjudicating disputes at the grassroots level, ensuring access to justice for all citizens.

Specialized tribunals and constitutional courts further augment the judiciary’s efficacy by addressing specific areas of law and interpreting the Constitution. From environmental matters to taxation disputes, these specialized bodies cater to the diverse legal needs of society the Indian judiciary is not confined to formal courts alone; quasi-judicial bodies like the National Human Rights Commission and Juvenile Justice Boards contribute to the administration of justice and protection of human rights in the country.

Indian judiciary system embodies the principles of justice, equality, and fairness enshrined in the Constitution. It stands as a bulwark against injustice, ensuring that the rights and freedoms of all citizens are upheld, and the rule of law prevails. Through its diverse array of institutions and mechanisms, the judiciary continues to evolve and adapt to meet the evolving needs and challenges of Indian society, reaffirming its role as the guardian of justice and the protector of democracy.

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India

Concept of Secularism and Meaning in Constitution

Shreya Sharma
-
0
Concept of Secularism and Meaning in Constitution

Secularism

Secularism is a principle advocating for the separation of religion from governmental institutions and public affairs. It ensures that religious groups do not interfere in the affairs of the state, and that the state does not interfere in religious matters. This separation aims to ensure that people of all religions, as well as those with no religion, are treated equally before the law and can coexist peacefully without state preference or discrimination based on religion.

Key aspects of secularism include:

1. Neutrality: The state remains neutral on matters of religion, neither supporting nor opposing any particular religion or religious beliefs.

2. Equal Treatment: Individuals are treated equally regardless of their religious beliefs, ensuring freedom of religion and belief.

3. Public Policy: Decisions and policies are made based on reason, evidence, and universal principles rather than religious doctrines.

4. Freedom of Religion: Individuals have the right to practice their religion freely without interference from the state, as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.

Secularism can manifest differently depending on the country and its specific legal and cultural context, but the core idea is the promotion of a society where religion and state operate independently of each other.

Meaning in the Constitution of various countries

In the context of a constitution, secularism typically refers to the explicit separation of religion from the functions and institutions of the state. This principle is enshrined to ensure that the government remains neutral in religious matters and does not favor or endorse any religion. It often includes provisions to protect the freedom of religion, prohibiting the state from establishing a religion, and ensuring equal treatment of all citizens regardless of their religious beliefs.

For instance, in the context of different countries:

1. United States: The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the establishment of religion by the government and ensures the free exercise of religion. This is often summarized as the “separation of church and state.”

2. India: The Preamble to the Indian Constitution describes India as a “secular” nation, which implies that the state treats all religions impartially and does not favor or discriminate against any religion. Articles 25 to 28 of the Indian Constitution guarantee the right to freedom of religion.

3. France: The principle of laïcité, embedded in the French Constitution, ensures that the state remains strictly secular. The 1905 French law on the Separation of the Churches and the State formalized this principle, ensuring that public policies and institutions remain free from religious influence.

In essence, when secularism is incorporated into a constitution, it provides a legal framework for maintaining the independence of state and religion, safeguarding individuals’ rights to religious freedom, and promoting equal treatment for all citizens irrespective of their religious affiliations.

Indian Constitution and Secularism

The Indian Constitution explicitly recognizes and enshrines the principle of secularism. This commitment to secularism is reflected in various provisions and articles within the Constitution, ensuring that India remains a secular state where all religions are treated equally. Here are the key aspects of how secularism is recognized in the Indian Constitution:

1. Preamble:

The Preamble to the Constitution of India declares India to be a “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.” The inclusion of the term “secular” underscores the state’s commitment to maintaining a neutral stance in religious matters.

2. Articles 25-28:

These articles guarantee the right to freedom of religion and ensure the state’s neutrality in religious affairs:

– Article 25: Guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality, and health.

– Article 26: Provides the right to manage religious affairs, allowing every religious denomination or any section thereof to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes.

– Article 27: Prohibits compelling any person to pay taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.

– Article 28: Ensures that no religious instruction is provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out-of-state funds.

3. Article 14:

Guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. This principle of equality is fundamental to secularism, as it ensures that the state does not discriminate based on religion.

4. Article 15:

Prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This reinforces the secular nature of the state by ensuring equal treatment for all citizens.

5. Article 44:

Directs the state to endeavor to secure a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) for all citizens. While this directive principle is not enforceable by any court, it reflects the vision of a common set of laws governing all citizens, irrespective of their religion, in matters of marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption.

6. Article 51A(e):

As part of the Fundamental Duties, it obliges every citizen to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India, transcending religious, linguistic, and regional or sectional diversities.

These constitutional provisions collectively enshrine the principle of secularism in India, ensuring that the state remains neutral in religious matters and guarantees equal treatment and freedom of religion to all its citizens.

More detail 

Preamble
The Preamble to the Constitution of India was amended by the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 to include the word “secular.” It declares India to be a “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” signifying the nation’s commitment to maintain a secular state.

 Articles 25 to 28: Freedom of Religion

Article 25: Freedom of Conscience and Free Profession, Practice, and Propagation of Religion
– Content: Article 25 guarantees all individuals the freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion.
– Restrictions: This freedom is subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions of Part III of the Constitution. It allows the state to regulate or restrict any economic, financial, political, or other secular activity associated with religious practice and provides for social welfare and reform.
– Impact: This ensures that religious practices do not interfere with public order or the rights of others, maintaining a balance between religious freedom and social harmony.

 Article 26: Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs
– Content: Article 26 grants every religious denomination or any section thereof the right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes, manage its own affairs in matters of religion, own and acquire movable and immovable property, and administer such property in accordance with law.
– Impact: This article protects the autonomy of religious groups in managing their internal affairs while subjecting them to the laws of the land.

 Article 27: Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion
– Content: Article 27 prohibits compelling any person to pay taxes the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated for the payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.
– Impact: This ensures that state funds are not used to support any religion, reinforcing the secular nature of the state.

 Article 28: Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions
– Content: Article 28 provides that no religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds. It also stipulates that no person attending any educational institution recognized by the state or receiving state aid shall be required to participate in any religious instruction or worship without their consent or, if a minor, without the consent of their guardian.
– Impact: This protects individuals from being forced into religious instruction or worship in educational settings funded or recognized by the state, maintaining religious neutrality in public education.

 Article 14: Equality Before the Law
– Content: Article 14 states that the state shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.
– Impact: This guarantees that all individuals, regardless of their religion, are treated equally before the law, which is a foundational principle of secularism.

 Article 15: Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Religion, Race, Caste, Sex, or Place of Birth
– Content: Article 15 prohibits discrimination by the state against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, or any of them.
– Impact: This ensures that no citizen is discriminated against by the state based on their religion, promoting equality and secularism.

 Article 44: Uniform Civil Code
– Content: Article 44, a Directive Principle of State Policy, directs the state to endeavor to secure for citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
– Impact: While not enforceable by any court, it reflects the state’s goal to unify personal laws applicable to different religious communities under a common civil code, promoting national unity and equality.

 Article 51A(e): Fundamental Duties
– Content: Article 51A(e) lists one of the fundamental duties of every citizen of India: to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India, transcending religious, linguistic, and regional or sectional diversities.
– Impact: This duty encourages citizens to foster social harmony and a sense of unity, which is essential in a secular state.

Summary

The Indian Constitution enshrines secularism by ensuring freedom of religion, prohibiting religious discrimination, and maintaining state neutrality in religious matters. These provisions collectively foster an environment where individuals of all religions can coexist peacefully, and the state can function without religious bias.

Cases

There have been several significant cases in India that have shaped the understanding and application of secularism. Here are a few landmark Supreme Court cases that have dealt with the principle of secularism:

1. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
This is one of the most important cases related to secularism in India.

 Background:
The case arose out of the dismissal of several state governments by the central government, invoking Article 356 of the Constitution, which allows the President to impose President’s rule in a state.

 Judgment:
– The Supreme Court, in its judgment, held that secularism is a basic feature of the Constitution.
– The Court stated that any action by the state that promotes or favors a particular religion violates the secular nature of the Constitution.
– It ruled that the power under Article 356 should be used sparingly and that the courts can review the proclamation of the President’s rule.
– This case underscored that secularism means treating all religions equally and that the government must remain neutral in religious matters.

 2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

Although this case is primarily known for the “basic structure doctrine,” it has significant implications for secularism.

Background:
Swami Kesavananda Bharati challenged the Kerala government’s attempts to impose restrictions on the management of religious property.

Judgment:
– The Supreme Court ruled that while Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its “basic structure.”
– Secularism was recognized as one of the essential features of the basic structure of the Constitution.
– This means that any amendment that seeks to undermine the secular character of the Constitution would be invalid.

3. Aruna Roy v. Union of India (2002)
This case dealt with the content of education and secularism.

 Background:
The validity of the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) issued by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) was challenged on the grounds that it introduced religious instruction in violation of the secular nature of the Constitution.

Judgment:
– The Supreme Court upheld the NCFSE, stating that its content did not violate the principles of secularism as enshrined in the Constitution.
– The Court noted that while religious education is prohibited in state-funded institutions, general education about all religions, imparting values common to all, does not violate the principle of secularism.
– The judgment clarified that education that promotes a broad understanding of all religions and fosters tolerance is consistent with the secular fabric of the Constitution.

4. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)
This case, also known as the Mandal Commission case, primarily dealt with reservations but touched upon the issue of secularism in the context of equality and non-discrimination.

Background:
The case challenged the implementation of recommendations for reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in government jobs and educational institutions.

Judgment:
– The Supreme Court upheld the reservations, reinforcing the idea that affirmative action is consistent with the principle of equality.
– The judgment mentioned that secularism in India also implies the removal of historical social inequalities and that measures aimed at achieving social justice do not violate secularism.

5. T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)
This case focused on the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.

 Background:
Minority educational institutions challenged certain state regulations that they felt infringed upon their rights to administer institutions of their choice.

 Judgment:
– The Supreme Court ruled that minorities have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
– It held that while the state can regulate these institutions to maintain educational standards, it cannot interfere with their administration to the extent that it negates the constitutional rights granted to minorities.
– The judgment balanced the rights of minorities with the state’s interest in ensuring quality education, emphasizing that secularism includes protecting the rights of all communities to preserve their culture and educational rights.

Summary
These cases collectively underscore that secularism in India means equal treatment of all religions by the state, non-interference in religious matters, and protection of religious freedoms and minority rights. The Indian judiciary has consistently upheld secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution, ensuring that any action undermining this principle is subject to scrutiny and correction.

Also read:

How To Send A Legal Notice In India

1...505152...70Page 51 of 70

TESTIMONIALS

LawArticle review

Contact us: info@lawarticle.in

FOLLOW US

© 2016-2025 eduLex Solutions | All Rights Reserved