Criminalization of Marital Rape

Introduction

Marriage is often seen as a sacred bond in Indian culture, built upon love, companionship, and mutual respect. However, behind this sacred relationship, many women suffer silently when they are forced into sexual acts by their husbands without consent. This act is known as marital rape — a situation where a husband compels his wife to have sexual intercourse against her will. Although the Indian Penal Code (IPC) recognises rape as a grave crime, it exempts sexual acts within marriage from the definition of rape. This legal loophole has led to widespread debate among legal scholars, activists, and women’s rights groups. The issue raises an important question: should a woman lose her right to consent after marriage?

Understanding Marital Rape

Under Section 375 of the IPC, rape is defined as sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent or against her will. However, the law contains Exception 2, which clearly states that sexual intercourse by a man with his wife, provided she is above 18 years of age, does not amount to rape. This means that forced sexual acts within marriage are not punishable under Indian law. The provision assumes that marriage automatically implies permanent consent for sexual relations, which denies a woman’s individual autonomy over her own body.

Historical Context

The immunity given to husbands under Indian law originates from the British colonial era. The idea came from a 17th-century English jurist, Sir Matthew Hale, who claimed that once a woman marries, she gives her husband an irrevocable right to sexual relations. This outdated principle was carried into the Indian Penal Code of 1860, drafted during British rule. Even after independence, India continued to follow this colonial mindset. Over the years, while reforms were made to strengthen laws against rape and sexual assault, the marital rape exception remained untouched, reflecting the deep-rooted patriarchal notion that a husband owns his wife’s body.

Constitutional Viewpoint

From a constitutional perspective, the marital rape exception contradicts several Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

1. Right to Equality (Article 14):
   By treating married women differently from unmarried women in cases of rape, the law violates the principle of equality before the law.
2. Right against Discrimination (Article 15):
   The exception discriminates based on marital status, which is unconstitutional.
3. Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21):
   The Supreme Court has expanded Article 21 to include the right to live with dignity and bodily integrity. Marital rape clearly violates this right by denying women control over their own bodies.

Thus, the marital rape exception goes against the spirit of equality, dignity, and freedom guaranteed to every citizen.

Judicial Interpretation 

Indian courts have shown cautious but progressive interpretation regarding marital rape.

1. Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018):
   While striking down the adultery law, the Court observed that marriage does not mean a woman loses her individual identity or rights. This reasoning strengthens the argument that marital rape should not be legally exempted. Though marital rape is still not criminalised, these rulings reflect a slow but positive movement towards recognising the importance of consent in marriage.

India, on the other hand, still retains the colonial exception, even though it is a signatory to international treaties such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). This inconsistency shows a gap between India’s global commitments and domestic legal reality.

Arguments Supporting Criminalisation

1. Violation of Human Rights:
   Marital rape is a direct attack on a woman’s right to dignity, equality, and bodily integrity. It treats her as property rather than a human being.
2. Consent is Essential:
   Consent must exist in every sexual act. Marriage cannot be an unconditional consent for life.
3. Legal Protection for Victims:
   Many women suffer physical and mental trauma due to forced sex within marriage, but cannot seek justice because the law fails to recognise the offence.
4. Changing Nature of Marriage:
   Modern marriages are built on mutual respect and partnership, not on domination. The law must evolve accordingly.
5. International Standards:
   Criminalisation would bring India in line with progressive international laws that prioritise human rights and gender equality.

Arguments Against Criminalisation

1. Possibility of Misuse:
   Critics argue that the law could be misused by wives to harass their husbands during marital conflicts.
2. Difficulty in Proving Lack of Consent:
   In an ongoing marriage, proving a lack of consent can be complex, as sexual relations are often private matters.
3. Impact on Family Life:
   Some believe criminalising marital rape may lead to more family disputes or divorces.

However, these arguments are weak compared to the suffering caused by marital rape. Like any other law, safeguards can be introduced to prevent misuse, but justice should not be denied on this basis.

Law Commission and Committee Recommendations

The 172nd Law Commission Report (2000) and the Justice Verma Committee Report (2013) both recommended removing the marital rape exception. The Verma Committee, formed after the 2012 Delhi gang rape incident, strongly stated that marriage cannot be a valid defence for sexual assault. Despite these recommendations, the government has resisted making changes, claiming that the issue is “socially sensitive” and  could “destabilise the institution of marriage.” This hesitation shows that social and political will, rather than legal difficulty, is the main obstacle to reform.

Current Legal Laws

At present, India does not criminalise marital rape if the wife is over 18 years of age. However, women can seek limited relief under:

• Section 498A IPC (Cruelty by husband or relatives)
• Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

These laws protect against physical and sexual abuse, but do not define non-consensual sex within marriage as rape. As a result, victims of marital rape continue to be denied complete justice.

Conclusion

The debate on criminalising marital rape is not just about punishing husbands — it is about recognising women’s right to consent and dignity. Marriage should not strip a woman of her autonomy over her body. The law must evolve with society, and equality cannot exist where consent is ignored. Criminalising marital rape will not destroy marriages; it will make them stronger by basing them on mutual respect and understanding. India, as a democratic and constitutional nation, must take a firm stand that no woman, married or unmarried, should be forced into sexual acts against her will. True justice can only be achieved when the right to say “no” is respected — even within marriage.

Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India