One Nation One Election
The term one nation, one election has been very often heard by us in the last few months. It is also the most controversial and hot topic in our society. Now that the Indian parliament has approved it, it has become a legal one, and the controversy has become a bit less aggravated.
The largest democracy in the world, India, has an almost continuous election cycle, wherein Lok Sabha, state assembly, and local body polls are held at different times across the country. “One Nation, One Election” refers to a synchronized electoral process wherein elections to the Lok Sabha and all the state legislative assemblies are held simultaneously. This proposal aims to harmonize the democratic process, reduce frequent election costs and administrative burdens, and ensure smooth governance.
Although simultaneous elections were practised till 1967, the system of staggered elections evolved because of political and administrative development. Re-introducing this system is a national discourse, debating whether it would work in practice, or if the advantages outweigh the consequences for federalism and democracy. The proposal would be a fundamental change like elections and governance in India.
Objectives of One Nation, One Election
The “One Nation, One Election” scheme main objectives are to follow these as:
1. Cost Efficiency:
It will also help the government to cut back the expenses undertaken for holding the elections separately along with the related logistics, security, and other man force expenditures.
2. Minimizing Electoral Fatigue:
Voter fatigue generally develops if different elections demand their attention time after time. Voters will participate increasingly due to frequent elections being put upon them one after the other.
3. Continuity in Governance:
Repeated elections call for a Model Code of Conduct, a partial suspension of all decision-making and development projects. A synchronized election will lead to streamlined governance and continued policy.
4. Efficient Usage of Resources
This is geared toward the best possible use of administrative and security resources, especially personnel and EVMs which are often used in repeated elections at low levels.
5. Political Stability:
This step towards political stability is done by reducing hegemony of incessant campaigning and shifting focus away from short-term electoral gains towards long-term governance and policy building.
6. Boosting Voter Turnout:
Elections at the same time could boost voters’ turnout because citizens would vote for the state and central elections on the same day.
7. Strengthening Democracy:
It would result in an integrated and simplified electoral process reflective of the maturity and efficiency of the Indian democratic system without a compromise on the integrity of the federal structure.
For these, the “One Nation, One Election” is intended to make the electoral system of India along with the framework of governance more effective.
Impact on the Future
The implementation of “One Nation, One Election” may lead to drastic changes in the political, administrative, and governance landscape of India.
The possible impact on the future is as follows:
1. Reduced Election-Related Expenditure
This would reduce dramatically the cost involved in holding multiple elections, as such costs include logistical and deployment of security forces as well as the usage of electronic voting machines. All this saved cost could then be directed towards developmental projects that benefit public welfare.
2. Shift in Governance Dynamics
Frequent elections often interrupt governance because the Model Code of Conduct restricts announcements of policy and developmental activities. The unified elections may help ensure uninterrupted governance and provide a long-term policy perspective.
3. Political Stability
By aligning elections, political parties would concentrate on long-term governance and strategic development rather than short-term populist measures aimed at winning consecutive elections. This may result in a more stable and consistent policy environment.
4. More Vibrant Voter Turnouts
Consolidation of elections can also make voter turnouts more vibrant since on the same day, people can vote for the state government as well as the central government. Thus, it might improve democratic participation and representativeness.
5. Stronger National Integration
Simultaneous elections may encourage national unity because voters are made to think of both state and national issues simultaneously. This will lead to greater cohesion in policymaking and a unified vision for development.
6. Challenges to Regional Issues
This could easily blur the electoral landscape and might undermine the voices of state and local concerns, weakening their autonomy over the representation issues.
7. Reform in Election Campaign
The combined election timeline may reduce the frequency of election campaigns, save resources, and curb the culture of constant political rallying. Campaign strategies would have to change, perhaps becoming more issue-focused and comprehensive.
8. Stronger Institutional Framework
This would demand significant alterations in India’s election management framework. For instance, it would require amendments in the constitution along with greater cooperation between the Election Commission of India and the state election commissions. It may lead to a stronger and more efficient electoral system.
9. Long-term Effect on Federalism
While centralizing the elections might breed efficiency, it would raise a doubt about the very foundation of federalism. There is an acute need for balancing the equation to ensure that the voices of states and regions are not muffled for the sake of protection of balance of power in the Indian federal structure.
Recent Status
India is widely recognized as the largest democracy in the world, distinguished by its continuous electoral cycles that reflect the active participation of its citizenry. The country is comprised of 28 states and eight union territories, which together account for nearly one billion registered voters. This substantial electorate ensures that electoral processes are a constant and integral feature of the nation’s political landscape.
The initiative known as “One Nation, One Election,” has gained traction as a significant reform concept, primarily driven by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) under the stewardship of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This proposal seeks to synchronize the timings of state and federal elections, thereby conducting them every five years as a combined electoral exercise. The Indian law minister introduced a legislative proposal advocating for this reform on January 14, 2025. This announcement has generated extensive discourse surrounding the implications of such a change on the power dynamics within the country and the political strategies of various parties.
Proponents of the “One Nation, One Election” reform argue that it presents a multifaceted opportunity for enhancing the efficiency of electoral processes. They assert that synchronizing elections could lead to a dramatic reduction in the costs associated with conducting multiple elections, which often drain public resources. By consolidating these electoral events, the burden on bureaucratic structures is expected to decrease significantly, thus facilitating a more streamlined governance process. Additionally, the proposal aims to minimize the distractions and political campaigning that usually accompany multiple elections, allowing for a greater focus on policy implementation and governance.
Former President Ram Nath Kovind, who was a member of a nine-person committee that advocated for concurrent elections in the previous year, underscored the potentially transformative impact of this initiative, labelling it a game-changer for the nation’s political framework. Furthermore, several economists have posited that this reform may also contribute positively to India’s economic growth, with estimates suggesting that it could augment the country’s Gross Domestic Product by as much as 1.5%. This potential economic benefit underscores the broader implications of the reform, extending beyond the electoral system to encompass overall national development.
Conclusion
A successfully implemented “One Nation, One Election” will redefine the future of India’s electoral and governance systems. The merits it are efficiency, cost reduction, and political stability; however, these have to be carefully weighed against the challenges, particularly those concerning regional representation and federalism, if it is not to compromise democratic principles.
Also, Read:
Rights of Undertrial Prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India