Disqualification on Conviction under the Representation of Peoples’ Act, 1951

Abstract

The Representation of the People Act, 1951, lays down provisions regarding the disqualification of individuals convicted of certain offences from contesting elections in India. Under Section 8(1) of the Act, various offences, ranging from bribery to promoting enmity between different groups, lead to disqualification. This article provides an overview of the statutory provisions, duration of disqualification, impact on electoral participation, the role of the Election Commission, and policy considerations surrounding these disqualifications.

Introduction

Recent judicial activism, notably reflected in Supreme Court judgments on electoral law, has brought about significant changes, particularly in the disqualifications of lawmakers. The striking down of Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, which allowed convicted Members of Parliament or State Legislatures to continue their membership, highlights a shift towards greater accountability in Indian politics. This move comes amidst growing concerns over the criminalization of politics and corrupt electoral practices. Former Supreme Court Justice Markandey Katju emphasized the role of judicial activism in transforming Indian society, particularly in combating feudal influences.

Qualifications for Election to the Lok Sabha:

To contest as a candidate for election to the Lok Sabha, individuals must meet certain qualifications as outlined in the Constitution of India and related laws:

1. Citizenship: Candidates must be citizens of India.
2. Oath or Affirmation: They must make and subscribe to an oath or affirmation as prescribed by the Election Commission.
3. Age: Candidates must be at least twenty-five years old on the date of scrutiny of nominations.
4. Reserved Seats: For seats reserved for Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes:

• Scheduled Castes: Candidates must be a member of any Scheduled Caste and an elector for any parliamentary constituency.
• Scheduled Tribes: Candidates must be a member of any Scheduled Tribe and an elector for any parliamentary constituency, with variations for different states and territories.
• General Seats: Candidates contesting general seats must meet the basic qualifications without specific reservation criteria.

Qualifications for Election to a Legislative Assembly

To contest as a candidate for election to a Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) of a State or Union Territory, individuals must meet specific qualifications:

1. Citizenship: Candidates must be citizens of India.
2. Oath or Affirmation: They must make and subscribe to an oath or affirmation as prescribed by the Election Commission.
3. Age: Candidates must be at least twenty-five years old on the date of scrutiny of nominations.
4. Reserved Seats: For seats reserved for Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes:

• Scheduled Castes: Candidates must be a member of any Scheduled Caste and an elector for any assembly constituency.
• Scheduled Tribes: Candidates must be a member of any Scheduled Tribe and an elector for any assembly constituency, with variations for different states and territories.

1. General Seats: Candidates contesting general seats must meet the basic qualifications without specific reservation criteria.

Disqualifications for Election

Disqualifications for candidates seeking election to the Lok Sabha or Legislative Assemblies include constitutional and statutory provisions:

1. Constitutional Disqualifications

• Holding Office of Profit: Candidates must not hold any office of profit under the Government of India or any State, with exceptions outlined in the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959.
• Other criteria include not being an undischarged insolvent, not being a citizen of India, and not being disqualified under any law made by Parliament.

2. Statutory Disqualifications

 The Representation of the People Act, 1951 lists various disqualifications, including:

• Conviction of specific offenses such as promoting enmity between groups, bribery, rape-related offenses, cruelty towards women, corruption, terrorism, and others.
• Conviction under laws related to hoarding, profiteering, adulteration of food or drugs, dowry prohibition, and more.
• Disqualification for election expenses misconduct, dismissal for corruption or disloyalty, contracts with the government, holding certain positions in government companies, and failure to lodge election expense accounts.

These disqualifications can result in immediate disqualification or disqualification for a specified period, as determined by the Election Commission or legislative bodies.

Disqualification on Conviction under the Representation of the People Act, 1951

Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, individuals can be disqualified from contesting elections if convicted of certain offences. These disqualifications include convictions for offenses such as promoting enmity between different groups, bribery, rape, cruelty towards women, corruption, terrorism, and more. Additionally, convictions under laws related to hoarding, profiteering, adulteration of food or drugs, dowry prohibition, and other specified offences can also lead to disqualification.

If an individual is convicted of any of these offences, they are disqualified from contesting elections for a period of six years from the date of conviction. If the conviction includes a prison sentence, the disqualification continues for an additional six years from the date of release. In cases where a person is convicted of multiple offences in a single trial, the cumulative length of imprisonment determines the disqualification period.

It’s important to note that these disqualifications are statutory and are enforced by the Election Commission. They aim to uphold the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that individuals with criminal records or involvement in specified offences do not hold public office.

Statutory provisions for Disqualification on Conviction under the Representation of Peoples’ Act, 1951

Section 8(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951

This provision outlines the disqualification of individuals convicted of certain offences. These offences include:

• Promoting enmity between different groups.
• Bribery.
• Rape-related offenses.
• Cruelty towards women.
• Corruption.
• Terrorism.
• Various other offences are listed under this section.

Duration of Disqualification

•  If convicted of any offence listed in Section 8(1), the individual is disqualified from contesting elections for a period of six years from the date of conviction.
• If the conviction results in a prison sentence, the disqualification period extends for an additional six years from the date of release.

Additional Offences and Disqualifications

• Apart from the offences listed under Section 8(1), convictions under other specified laws can also lead to disqualification, as outlined in the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
• These offences include offences related to hoarding, profiteering, adulteration of food or drugs, dowry prohibition, and more.

Enforcement

The Election Commission oversees the enforcement of these disqualifications, ensuring that individuals convicted of specified offences are not allowed to contest elections for the prescribed period.

Purpose

These disqualifications aim to maintain the integrity of the electoral process by preventing individuals with criminal records or involvement in specified offences from holding public office or contesting elections.

By adhering to these statutory provisions, the electoral system aims to uphold transparency, accountability, and fairness in the democratic process.

Scope of Offences

• The offences listed under Section 8(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, cover a wide range of criminal activities, including those that undermine the democratic process, such as bribery, corruption, and promoting enmity between different groups.
• These provisions aim to ensure that individuals convicted of serious crimes or offenses against the public interest are not eligible to hold public office or contest elections.

Impact on Electoral Participation

• Disqualifications resulting from convictions under the Act can have significant implications for individuals seeking to participate in the electoral process.
• It restricts their ability to stand as candidates in elections, thereby limiting their political involvement and representation.

Legal Process and Appeals

Individuals who are convicted of offences under the Act have the option to appeal their convictions through the legal process.

However, until their convictions are overturned, or the disqualification period expires, they remain ineligible to contest elections.

Role of the Election Commission

• The Election Commission plays a crucial role in enforcing the disqualifications prescribed under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
•  It ensures that individuals who are disqualified from contesting elections are not included on the electoral rolls or allowed to participate in the electoral process.

Public Perception and Accountability

• The implementation of these disqualifications underscores the importance of accountability and integrity in the electoral system.
• It reflects public expectations for elected representatives to uphold ethical standards and adhere to the rule of law.

Policy Considerations

• Discussions surrounding disqualifications under the Act often involve debates on the balance between protecting the integrity of the electoral process and allowing individuals opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
• Policymakers may consider amendments or revisions to the Act to address emerging challenges and ensure that the electoral system remains fair and transparent.

CASE LAWS

Sanjay Dutt v. State of Maharashtra (through CBI):

Issue: Whether conviction and sentence under the Arms Act disqualify from contesting elections under Section 8(3) of the RP Act, 1951, and if suspension of conviction is possible.

Judgement: Conviction under the Arms Act led to disqualification, and suspension of conviction was denied due to the serious nature of the offence and specific disqualification provision of the RP Act.

Navjot Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab:

Issue: Whether resignation from Parliament and desire to contest again warrant suspension of conviction under Section 8(3) of the RP Act, 1951.

Judgement: Suspension of conviction was granted based on the appellant’s commitment to ethical standards in public service and desire to contest elections.

Lily Thomas v. UOI:

Issues: Constitutional validity of Section 8(4) of RP Act, 1951; exclusive legislative authority of Parliament on disqualifications; deferral of disqualifications by Parliament.

Judgement: Section 8(4) was declared unconstitutional; Parliament has exclusive authority on disqualifications; Parliament cannot defer disqualifications to prevent vacancies.

Public Interest Foundation v. UOI:

Issue: Whether the Court can prescribe disqualifications beyond constitutional and legislative provisions.

Judgement: The Court cannot introduce new grounds for disqualification beyond those specified in the Constitution and legislation; directions issued for transparency in candidate disclosures.

Saritha S Nair v. Hibi Eden:

Issue: Disqualification under Section 8(3) of RP Act, 1951, based on suspended sentence.

Judgement: Disqualification is determined by the date of conviction and release, not just suspension of sentence.

These cases highlight the interplay between criminal convictions, disqualification from elections, and judicial discretion in suspending convictions, emphasizing the importance of legal provisions, constitutional validity, and ethical standards in public office.

Conclusion

Disqualification on conviction under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, serves as a crucial mechanism to uphold the integrity of India’s electoral system. By preventing individuals convicted of serious offences from contesting elections, the Act aims to maintain public trust, ensure accountability, and uphold ethical standards among elected representatives. However, as discussions on rehabilitation and reintegration continue, policymakers must carefully balance the need for accountability with considerations of fairness and rehabilitation. Ultimately, the effective implementation of these disqualifications is essential to safeguarding the democratic principles upon which India’s electoral process is founded

Also Read: 
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India