Introduction
Children’s rights in India, as per human rights principles, encompass a range of fundamental freedoms and protections aimed at ensuring their holistic development, safety, and well-being. These rights are enshrined in various international conventions and treaties, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), to which India is a signatory. The UNCRC outlines specific rights for children, including but not limited to the right to life, survival, and development; the right to education, healthcare, and social services; protection from exploitation, abuse, and discrimination; and the right to participate in decisions affecting them.
In India, these rights are reflected in constitutional provisions, statutory laws, and judicial interpretations. The Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental rights to children, such as the right to equality, freedom from discrimination, and protection of life and personal liberty under Articles 14, 15, 21, and 39(f). Additionally, laws like the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and the Right to Education Act, 2009, provide legal frameworks for safeguarding children’s rights in various contexts.
The judiciary plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing these rights, often issuing directives and judgments to protect children from harm, ensure access to education and healthcare, combat child labor and trafficking, and promote their overall well-being. India’s commitment to children’s rights aligns with international standards and reflects its obligation to uphold the dignity and rights of every child, regardless of background or circumstances.
Overall, children’s rights in India are integral to the country’s human rights framework, emphasizing the importance of nurturing and protecting the future generations to build a just and inclusive society
Case Law related to children’s rights in India:
- Independent Thought v. UOI (2017) 10 SCC 800: This case dealt with the issue of whether sexual intercourse with a girl between 15 and 18 years of age, who is married, constitutes rape. The Supreme Court analyzed Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which exempted sexual intercourse between a man and his wife from being considered rape if the wife is above 15 years of age. The Court held that Exception 2 was arbitrary and discriminatory, violating Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution. It raised the age of consent to 18 years for marital sexual intercourse, aligning it with the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), to protect the human rights of married girl children.
- Subramanian Swamy and Ors. Vs. Raju Thr. Member Juvenile Justice Board and Anr: This case arose from a heinous gang rape incident involving a juvenile. The question was whether the juvenile could be tried as an adult. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, stating that if legislative intent aligns with constitutional requirements and international commitments, the Court need not reinterpret the legislation. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering international standards and commitments in interpreting domestic laws.
- In Re Contagion of COVID-19 virus in Children’s Protection Homes (2020): During the COVID-19 pandemic, a writ petition was filed regarding the protection of children in observation homes and juvenile facilities. The Supreme Court issued directives to ensure the health and safety of children in these facilities, including setting up online help desks, preventing violence and harassment, and coordinating with child protection committees.
- Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India Others [2011] 5 SCC 1: This case focused on combating child trafficking and human rights violations, especially in circuses. The Court issued directives to presume abduction or trafficking in missing child cases, establish special police units for child protection, and create shelter homes for rescued children. It emphasized the need for coordinated efforts to address child trafficking effectively.
- M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1997 SC 699: The case addressed child labor in hazardous industries, particularly fireworks factories in Tamil Nadu. The Court prohibited child labor in such sectors, imposed fines on violators, established a Child Labour Rehabilitation Welfare Fund, and mandated education for child workers. It underscored the state’s responsibility to protect children from exploitation and ensure their education and welfare.
- Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 217: This case challenged state laws regulating capitation fees in private professional educational institutions. The Supreme Court recognized the right to education as a fundamental right under Article 21, directing states to provide free and compulsory education for children under 14. It emphasized the importance of education in fulfilling constitutional ideals and promoting social justice.
- Gaurav Jain v. Union of India and others, [1997] 8 SCC 114: Initiated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), this case focused on the rights and rehabilitation of children of sex workers. The Court emphasized the children’s right to equality, protection, and rehabilitation, ordering the establishment of juvenile homes and support systems. It highlighted the need to integrate these children into mainstream society while addressing the challenges they face due to their background.
These cases collectively demonstrate the judiciary’s role in safeguarding children’s rights, addressing societal issues, and ensuring compliance with constitutional principles and international standards
Conclusion
India has made notable progress in enhancing child rights through comprehensive laws and initiatives in education, health, and protection. However, significant challenges persist, including child labor, quality of education, health disparities, and gender discrimination. Continued efforts are needed to ensure effective law enforcement, improve service quality, and address socio-economic inequalities. Collaborative action among government, civil society, and international partners is essential to secure a better future for all children in India.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India