1. Introduction
Culpable Homicide and Murder: A Study under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
The value of human life is central to any criminal justice system. In India, the recent introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) has reshaped the framework for dealing with serious offences, including those involving loss of life. Among the most significant areas of criminal law are culpable homicide and murder, both of which are addressed comprehensively under the new legal regime. Understanding how these two offences differ—and how they are treated under BNS—is essential for anyone working in or studying Indian law.
2. Historical Overview and Legal Background
Prior to the BNS, the Indian Penal Code of 1860 (IPC) governed the classification and punishment of homicide offences. The distinction between culpable homicide and murder, although well-established, often caused confusion due to overlapping language and complex judicial interpretation. The BNS has attempted to bring greater clarity and structure to these definitions, making it easier for the judiciary and law enforcement to apply them uniformly.
3. Core Provisions in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Under the BNS, Sections 100 and 101 are crucial in addressing acts that lead to the death of a person. Here’s a breakdown of these provisions:
Culpable Homicide – Section 100
An act qualifies as culpable homicide when someone causes the death of another through:
- An intent to cause death;
- An intention to inflict an injury likely to result in death; or
- An act performed with knowledge that it is likely to cause death.
This section focuses on the mental element behind the action, with particular emphasis on intention and awareness of the consequences.
Murder – Section 101
Murder is essentially a more aggravated form of culpable homicide. It involves:
- A deliberate intent to cause death;
- Inflicting bodily harm that the offender knows could be fatal;
- An injury that is so severe that death is a natural and probable outcome; or
- Acts that are so dangerous they are almost certain to result in death, done without any lawful justification.
This section outlines the criteria for when culpable homicide becomes murder, generally depending on the degree of intent and the nature of the act.
4. Important Judicial Insights
Over the years, Indian courts have provided critical guidance in differentiating between culpable homicide and murder.
In the Govinda case (1876), the Bombay High Court explained that all murders are culpable homicides, but not all culpable homicides are murders—an important distinction that remains relevant under BNS.
The Supreme Court in Rayavarapu Punnayya v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1976) reiterated this principle and emphasized that understanding the state of mind of the accused is central to determining the nature of the offence.
5. Legal Interpretation and Analysis
The BNS has kept the essence of earlier interpretations intact but refined the language to reduce ambiguity. The key factor separating murder from culpable homicide remains intent and gravity. A simple act causing death might amount to culpable homicide, but the same act, when carried out with malice, preparation, or indifference to human life, is treated as murder.
The BNS also recognizes five exceptions under which culpable homicide does not qualify as murder. These include:
- Sudden and grave provocation;
- Exceeding the right of private defense;
- Acts committed by public servants in the line of duty;
- Sudden fights without premeditation;
- Consent of the deceased (if over 18 years of age).
These exceptions serve to humanize the law by considering the circumstances under which the act was committed.
6. A Look at Global Practices
Different countries approach homicide laws with their own classifications:
- In the United States, the law distinguishes between first-degree and second-degree murder, as well as voluntary and involuntary manslaughter.
- In the United Kingdom, the system separates murder from manslaughter, with consideration given to the level of foresight and provocation.
The BNS approach is similar in structure, though unique in its blend of moral philosophy and practical jurisprudence shaped by Indian societal conditions.
7. Ground-Level Challenges
Even with clearer language, real-world challenges remain in enforcement:
- Determining Intent: Proving the accused’s state of mind remains one of the toughest tasks in a courtroom.
- Gathering Evidence: In homicide cases, timelines and forensic proof are vital and sometimes hard to piece together.
- Avoiding Misuse: The law must ensure that exceptions are not used to shield deliberate murderers under the guise of provocation or self-defense.
Proper training for police, prosecutors, and judges is essential for the BNS to be applied correctly and fairly.
8. Current Trends and Recent Changes
The BNS reflects a shift toward a more modern, simplified, and victim-centered criminal justice system. By refining the definitions of serious crimes such as murder and culpable homicide, the law intends to improve both consistency in judgment and speed of trial.
There is also a greater emphasis on proportional punishment, ensuring that the nature of the offence aligns closely with the penalty awarded.
9. Suggestions and Path Forward
To further strengthen the application of these provisions, the following steps can be considered:
- Capacity building through continuous legal education for law enforcement and judiciary.
- Increased public legal awareness, especially around exceptions and rights of the accused.
- Regular audits and impact assessments of how the BNS is being used in homicide cases.
- Technology adoption in forensic investigation to aid in proving or disproving intent more accurately.
10. Conclusion
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, signifies a thoughtful evolution in how Indian law addresses the gravest of crimes—those that result in the loss of human life. By clearly distinguishing between culpable homicide and murder and embedding those distinctions in structured legal provisions, the BNS promises a fairer, more balanced system. Its real success, however, will depend on how effectively it’s interpreted in courts and understood by society.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India
