Introduction
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, introduces some of the crucial provisions which pertain to the protection of property marks, a part of the broader property rights in commerce. Sections 345 onwards deal with the legal provisions governing the integrity of these marks as symbols of ownership of movable property. The act seeks to combat fraudulent practices that can lead consumers astray and vitiate true ownership. By defining offenses related to false property marks, tampering, counterfeiting, and unauthorized use, the BNS reinforces the importance of honesty and transparency in trade. This framework not only safeguards the interests of businesses but also protects consumers from deception, thus promoting ethical practices in the marketplace. Understanding these provisions is essential for individuals and businesses alike to ensure compliance and uphold the principles of fair competition.
Section 345 to 350 BNS
Section 345 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, deals with the concept of a “property mark” and the consequences of the use of false property marks.
Important Provisions:
1. Definition of Property Mark:
A property mark is a symbol or sign that is used to show that a particular movable property belongs to a particular person.
2. Use of False Property Mark:
– A false property mark is said to exist if a person marks a movable property, goods, or their containers in a manner that would lead others to believe that the property belongs to another person.
Explanation in simpler words:
This section prevents individuals from marking an item in such a way as to make it appear owned by another person so that rightful ownership is protected and deception is prevented.
Illustration:
If a person labels their goods with a mark that is identical or similar to another person’s registered property mark, intending to mislead others into thinking the goods belong to the other person, this would constitute the use of a false property mark under Section 345.
Section 346: Tampering with Property Mark with Intent to Cause Injury
– Offense: Alteration, removal, or obliteration of a property mark on movable property with the intent to cause injury or wrongful loss to someone.
– Example: Hanging or removing a property mark on goods to mislead others about the ownership, causing potential loss to the rightful owner.
Section 347: Counterfeiting a Property Mark
– Offense: Creating a false property mark which is identical with or resembles another property mark with the intention of fraud.
– Example: Making a fake mark or logo that is substantially identical with a registered property mark, with the intention of misleading others to believe the goods are original.
Section 348: Using a False Property Mark
– Offense: Applying a counterfeit property mark to goods or their packaging, with the intent to impair another’s rights over the goods because of the origin or ownership.
– Example: Printing a false brand logo on commodities to make consumers believe that they are purchasing the original commodities.
Section 349: Counterfeiting of Property Marks and Possession of Instruments for such Counterfeiting
– Crime: Manufacturing or possession of devices or instruments which are specifically meant to create forged property marks.
– Example: Possession of a machine intended to print false labels or logos that resemble registered property marks.
Section 350: False Application for Property Mark Used by Another
– Offense: A person applies, to his own goods, without the other person’s consent, a property mark already in use by that other person, with intent to deceive.
-Example: Applying on his products the registered trademark belonging to a competitor to mislead consumers about the origin of the product.
These sections aim to protect the integrity of property marks and prevent fraudulent activities that may harm businesses and consumers.
Conclusion
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, lays out a solid legal structure meant to be impenetrable for the violation of property marks that are an integral part of rights in trade. Differentiating specific offences of misuse, tampering, counterfeiting, and unauthorized use of property marks, is bringing about a marketplace that runs on honesty and transparency. These provisions serve a two-fold purpose: they protect businesses from fraudulent practices that may put their operations at risk, while also protecting consumers from deception to ensure fair competition. As people and businesses make their way through the intricacies of commerce, knowledge and observance of these regulations will be essential in ensuring ethical standards and fair practice in the marketplace.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India
