Abstract
Cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are vital tools for corporate growth in India’s liberalized economy. They enable companies to access new markets, technologies, and capital, but are often hindered by a complex legal and regulatory environment.
Key challenges arise under:
- Companies Act, 2013 (Section 234)
- Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999
- SEBI takeover regulations
- Competition Act, 2002
This article examines challenges such as FDI restrictions, tax implications, antitrust concerns, valuation disputes, and post-merger integration issues, with insights from landmark cases like Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India. It suggests reforms for making India a more attractive M&A destination.
Introduction
In today’s globalized economy, cross-border M&A allows companies to expand globally and gain competitive advantages.
According to Statista, India’s M&A market is expected to reach US$19.28 billion by 2025, with cross-border transactions forming a significant share. In 2024 alone, inbound M&A surged 66%, led by IT, manufacturing, and banking sectors.
However, India’s strict compliance regime under multiple laws creates obstacles that lead to:
- Higher transaction costs
- Extended approval timelines (6–12 months)
- Regulatory uncertainty
This article explores the legal, tax, antitrust, and integration issues in India’s cross-border M&A landscape.
Key Legal Framework for Cross-Border M&A
- Companies Act, 2013 (Section 234) – Governs cross-border mergers approved by NCLT.
- FEMA, 1999 & Cross-Border Merger Regulations, 2018 – RBI approval required for outbound mergers.
- SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011 – Governs takeovers of listed companies; requires open offers.
- Competition Act, 2002 – CCI approval required for deals above asset/turnover thresholds.
- Income Tax Act, 1961 – Indirect transfers, transfer pricing, and GAAR affect deal structuring.
The Proof: Data, Arguments & Authority
Data Highlights
- Since 1996: 28,229 M&A deals worth over US$1 trillion.
- 2023–24 inbound FDI: US$70.95 billion.
- 20–30% deals discouraged due to approval delays and compliance hurdles.
Regulatory & Legal Challenges
1. FEMA Restrictions
- Outbound mergers only allowed with FATF-compliant jurisdictions or IFSCs.
- Narrow scope limits global expansion opportunities.
2. FDI Sectoral Caps
- Example: 26% cap in defense without prior government approval.
- Breach of limits can be declared ultra vires.
3. Valuation Disputes
- RBI mandates fair market value certification by a Category I Merchant Banker.
- Conflicts with commercial valuations, causing disputes in earn-outs and escrows.
4. Taxation Issues
- No exemption under Section 47 for cross-border mergers (unlike domestic mergers).
- Section 9(1)(i) taxes indirect transfers of Indian assets.
- Risk of double taxation without strong DTAAs.
- GAAR empowers authorities to strike down “artificial arrangements.”
5. Antitrust & SEBI Regulations
- CCI reviews under Section 5, even when no competition harm exists → delays closing.
- SEBI takeover code complicates staged acquisitions with mandatory open offers.
6. Post-Merger Integration
- Aligning corporate governance across jurisdictions.
- Labor law restrictions → layoffs require natural justice compliance.
- Hidden liabilities in IP, contracts, and environmental compliance.
Landmark Case Laws
Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India (2012)
- SC held offshore share transfers not taxable in India.
- Govt. introduced retrospective amendment in Section 9(1)(i) → shaken investor confidence.
- Led to reduced telecom M&A activity.
Tata Steel – Corus Deal (2007)
- US$12 billion acquisition faced post-deal hurdles: high EU energy costs, cheap Chinese steel, and union laws.
- Highlighted integration and overvaluation risks in cross-border deals.
Jet Airways – Etihad Deal (2013)
- Etihad’s 24% stake reviewed by CCI, SEBI, and RBI.
- CCI imposed conditions on routes, slots, and fares.
- Raised governance concerns despite minority stake → “de facto control” debate.
Conclusion
Cross-border M&A is a critical driver of India’s growth story, but faces:
- Regulatory complexity (multiple overlapping authorities)
- Taxation unpredictability (retrospective amendments, GAAR, transfer pricing)
- Integration challenges (labor, culture, valuation gaps)
Suggested Reforms
- Align valuation norms with global practices.
- Expand jurisdictions eligible for outbound mergers.
- Strengthen DTAA enforcement to avoid double taxation.
- Provide tax certainty for foreign investors.
With investor-friendly reforms, India can position itself as a global M&A hub while balancing liberalization and protectionism—a step towards its US$5 trillion economy target.
References
- White & Case – Indian Cross-Border M&A: High-Valuation Hurdles (2024)
- Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research – Legal Challenges in Cross-Border M&A (2025)
- De Facto Law Journal – Corporate Law & M&A
- SSRN – India & Cross-Border M&A (2025)
- Enterslice – Vodafone Case & Taxation Impact (2023)
- Statista – M&A Market India
- IMAA Institute – M&A Statistics by Country
- LawBhoomi – Jet Airways–Etihad Case (2025)
- DLA Piper – Cross-Border M&A Framework in India
FAQs
Q1. What regulatory approvals are needed for cross-border M&A in India?
RBI (FEMA), SEBI (listed companies), CCI (antitrust), NCLT (merger schemes), plus sectoral approvals.
Q2. How does taxation affect M&A deals?
Indirect transfers may attract capital gains tax under Section 9(1)(i). Transfer pricing and GAAR increase scrutiny.
Q3. Why is due diligence important in cross-border M&A?
It uncovers risks in IP, labor, contracts, and environmental compliance, while ensuring FDI compliance.
Q4. Can Indian companies execute outbound mergers freely?
No. They’re restricted to FATF-compliant jurisdictions/IFSCs, with mandatory RBI approval.
Q5. What impact did the Vodafone case have?
The retrospective tax amendment reduced investor confidence, especially in capital-intensive sectors.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India
