Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Human Rights in India

Introduction

Privacy is a basic need of every human being. It gives people the freedom to live life on their own terms, to make personal choices without fear, and to protect their dignity in society. Without privacy, liberty becomes incomplete, because an individual constantly feels under watch and control. In India, the recognition of the right to privacy has been a long journey. Today, it is considered a fundamental human right, but this recognition came only after decades of debate and judicial interpretation.

The Concept of Privacy

Privacy essentially means the right to be left alone. It protects individuals from unwarranted intrusion by the State, society, or even private entities. It is not limited to physical space but extends to personal choices, family life, communication, reputation, and control over personal data. In simple words, privacy gives an individual control over “what to reveal” and “what to conceal.”

Globally, privacy has been regarded as an inseparable part of human dignity. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) under Article 12 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) under Article 17 guarantee the right to privacy. India, being a signatory to these instruments, has also moved in the direction of protecting this right through constitutional interpretation.

Constitutional Position in India

Interestingly, the Indian Constitution does not explicitly mention the “right to privacy.” However, it provides for fundamental rights such as the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), the right to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19), and the right to equality (Article 14). The courts, through interpretation, gradually evolved privacy as part of these rights.

Initially, the right to privacy was not considered fundamental. In M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954), the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not specifically protect privacy. Similarly, in Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1962), the Court rejected the argument that privacy was a guaranteed right, although it struck down domiciliary visits at night as unconstitutional.But over time, with changing social realities and a deeper understanding of liberty, the judiciary began to recognize privacy as implicit in Article 21.

Evolution through Judicial Interpretation

The recognition of privacy as a fundamental right came step by step through several landmark cases:

Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1975):

The Supreme Court acknowledged that privacy could be protected as part of personal liberty under Article 21, though subject to reasonable restrictions.People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India (1997):
This case dealt with telephone tapping. The Court held that the right to privacy includes the right to private conversations and imposed guidelines to prevent misuse of surveillance powers.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017):

This nine-judge bench decision finally settled the question. The Court unanimously declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right, protected under Articles 14, 19, and 21. It overruled earlier decisions like M.P. Sharma and Kharak Singh. The Court also linked privacy with human dignity, autonomy, and freedom of choice.

Privacy in the Digital Age

The recognition of privacy has become even more important in the digital era. With smartphones, social media, online banking, and e-governance, individuals constantly share personal information. Data breaches, identity theft, and misuse of personal details are common threats.The Aadhaar controversy in India highlighted this concern. The requirement of linking Aadhaar to welfare schemes and bank accounts raised questions about surveillance and data security. The Supreme Court, in its Aadhaar judgment (2018), upheld the use of Aadhaar for welfare but struck down mandatory linking with services like mobile phones and bank accounts, emphasizing the need for proportionality and data protection.

Dimensions of the Right to Privacy

The Supreme Court in Puttaswamy recognized privacy as multi-dimensional. Some important aspects include:

1. Personal Autonomy: Freedom to make choices regarding marriage, family, procreation, and sexual orientation.
2. Informational Privacy: Right to control personal data and prevent misuse by State or private corporations.
3. Bodily Privacy: Protection against unauthorized medical tests, invasive searches, and non-consensual use of biological data.
4. Decisional Privacy: Autonomy in making intimate and personal decisions without external interference.

Privacy and Other Fundamental Rights

The right to privacy is closely connected with other fundamental rights:

1. Article 14 (Equality): Privacy ensures equal dignity for all, preventing arbitrary discrimination.
2. Article 19 (Freedom): Freedom of speech, movement, and association require a sphere of privacy to be meaningful.
3. Article 21 (Life and Liberty): The most direct connection, as privacy is essential for living with dignity.

Challenges in Ensuring Privacy in India

Even though privacy is now a fundamental right, challenges remain:

1. Lack of Comprehensive Data Protection Law: India still awaits a strong data protection framework, though the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, is a step forward.
2. Mass Surveillance Concerns: Government surveillance systems like Central Monitoring System .
3. Technology and AI: Increasing use of facial recognition, biometrics, and artificial intelligence threatens individual autonomy.
4. Balancing Security and Privacy: Issues like terrorism, cybercrime, and national security often clash with the protection of privacy.

Comparative Perspective

Many countries have already recognized privacy as a fundamental right. For instance:

1. In the United States, the Supreme Court has derived privacy rights from the “penumbras” of the Bill of Rights.
2. In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ensures strong protection of data and privacy.
3. In South Africa, the Constitution explicitly guarantees the right to privacy.
4. India, through judicial interpretation, has joined this global trend, though legislative and administrative safeguards are still evolving.

Importance of Recognizing Privacy as a Human Right

1. Democratic Strengthening: A society where individuals are free to think, speak, and associate without constant surveillance is truly democratic.
2. Individual Dignity: Privacy protects the dignity of individuals in personal choices and social life.
3. Trust in Governance: Citizens are more likely to trust the State when their private sphere is respected.
4. Adaptation to Technology: In the digital era, privacy ensures individuals can use technology without fear of misuse.

Conclusion

The right to privacy in India has emerged as a cornerstone of liberty and dignity. What was once dismissed as non-existent is now recognized as central to human existence. The Puttaswamy judgment stands as a milestone, affirming that privacy is not a luxury but a necessity. However, the real challenge lies in implementation balancing privacy with security, ensuring data protection, and educating citizens about their rights.

As India moves forward in a digital world, the protection of privacy will determine the strength of its democracy and the extent of individual freedom. A nation that respects privacy truly respects its citizens. Thus, the recognition of privacy as a fundamental human right is not just a legal development but a social and moral necessity in contemporary India.

Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India