The Apex Court held that an employee, who was employed in a supervisory capacity and drew waged exceeding Rs. 10k per month, did not come within the definition of ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947. The Court held that there was no violation of procedure on the part of management in terminating the services of the employee as it give the 1-month salary along with the notice which he refused to accept.
SC held employee in supervisory capacity not a workman
RELATED ARTICLES